ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Universal Exercise Unit Exercise on Upper Limb Strength Using Biodex Isokinetic (UEU/CP)

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy Spastic Hemiplegic

Treatments

Other: Control (Standard treatment)
Procedure: Experimental

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07233031
P.T.REC/012/004849

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of the study is to determine the role of designed program in the universal exercise unit on upper limb function and strength in children with spastic hemiplegia. forty children with spastic hemiplegia cerebral palsy from both sexes had been selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University . Children were divided into two groups of equal numbers; 20 patients in each group. Group A: Children in this group received a selected physical therapy program. Group B: Children in this group received a designed physical therapy program in UEU in addition to the selected physical therapy program. A-Materials for evaluation 1- For the Quality Of Upper Extremity Skill Test (QUEST),2- Biodex Isokinetic systems.Evaluation was carried out for each child individually before and after 3 months of treatment

Full description

This study is designed to answer the following question:

Is there an effect of designed program in universal exercise unit on upper limb function and strength in children with spastic hemiplegia? Purpose of The Study The purpose of the study is to determine the role of designed program in the universal exercise unit on upper limb function and strength in children with spastic hemiplegia.

Null Hypothesis Is there is no role of designed program in the universal exercise unit on the upper limb in children with spastic hemiplegia.

The study was concluded forty children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy from both sexes had been selected from according to the following criteria:

  • children ages were ranged from 5-9 years old.

  • The children had spasticity grades 1, 1+ degree according to Modified Ashworth scale

  • The children were selected to be in level I and II GMFCs

  • The children were selected to be in level II MACs participants had been excluded if they had the following:

    1. Visual or hearing impairment
    2. Orthopedic surgery of upper limbs for the last 6 months
    3. Cardiopulmonary diseases Children were equally assigned into two groups using simple randomization, control group (A) and study group (B). Each group would consist of 20 children with spastic hemiplegia CP.

Group (A): Children in this group received a selected physical therapy program. Group (B): Children in this group received the selected physical therapy program in addition to a designed physical therapy program in UEU.

Evaluation was carried out for each child individually before and after 3 months of treatment.

A-For Assessment

  1. The Quality of Upper Extremity Skill Test (Quest) The QUEST test included 34 items in four domains of (dissociated movement, grasp, weight bearing and protective extension).

    Each child was instructed to hold the position for at least two seconds. The total testing timing including the administration and scoring was approximately 45 minutes.

    The scoring was performed and recorded in scoring box. Even if the item was not tested (I.e: yes, no, not tested)

  2. The Biodex Isokinetic system The testing session had been started with a warm up procedure, consisting of shoulder movements in all directions, push up-exercises against the wall and stretching. For the testing procedure, the closed chain attachment was fixed to the isokinetic dynamometer in a horizontal position. Essentially, this device converts rotational motion at the dynamometer into linear motion, allowing closed kinematic chain or linear movements The evaluation was carried out for each child individually before and after three month of treatment.

Tested muscles were elbow flexors, elbow extensor, shoulder flexors, shoulder extensors.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Ages

5 to 9 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Their ages were ranged from 5-9 years old.
  • They had spasticity grades 1, 1+ degree according to Modified Ashworth scale
  • They were selected to be in level I and II GMFCs They were selected to be in level II MACs

Exclusion criteria

  • Visual or hearing impairment
  • Orthopedic surgery of upper limbs for the last 6 months
  • Cardiopulmonary diseases

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups

control (standard treatment)
Active Comparator group
Description:
children in control group received standard physiotherapy
Treatment:
Other: Control (Standard treatment)
experimental
Experimental group
Description:
a designed physical therapy program in Universal exercise that began with testing one repetition maximum (1-RM). One repetition maximum (1-RM) was determined through the chest press. children had been targeted upper limb strengthening program
Treatment:
Procedure: Experimental

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems