Effectiveness of Vestibular Electrical Stimulation in Vestibular Rehabilitation

Ankara City Hospital

Status: Completed

Conditions: Vestibular Diseases; Vestibular Vertigo; Vestibular Disorder

Treatments: Other: Vestibular Rehabilitation; Other: Vestibular Electrical Stimulation

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06563076

10026336 (Other Identifier)

E2-22-2962

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the vestibular rehabilitation program applied to patients with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction and the vestibular electrical stimulation applied to the trapezius muscles and cervical paravertebral muscles along with the rehabilitation program.

Full description

This study included 40 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction findings, aged between 18 and 65, and whose unilateral vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain for any semicircular canal was below 0.7 based on the video head impulse test (vHIT) test, were randomized into two groups. While one group underwent a supervised vestibular rehabilitation program for 4 weeks, the other group received 80 Hz high frequency transcutaneous vestibular electrical stimulation (VES) in addition to the supervised vestibular rehabilitation program. The treatment was applied to each group, 3 days a week, for a total of 12 sessions. Detailed musculoskeletal system examinations and vestibular system examinations of the included patients were performed, and sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level) were recorded. Both groups were tested before treatment and at the end of the 4th week, Dizziness Disability Inventory (DHI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Activity-Specific Balance and Confidence Scale (ABCs), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Static Posturography.

Enrollment: 38 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Being between the ages of 18-65
• Patients who were evaluated by a Neurologist, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist and otorhinolaryngologist and diagnosed with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction and have findings of chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction
• Patients whose VOR gain for any unilateral semicircular canal based on vHIT test is below 0.7
• Patients who volunteered to participate in the study and signed the consent forms

Exclusion criteria

• Existing neurological or mental disorders
• Patients using vestibulosuppressant drugs
• Stroke, head trauma and other neurological diseases
• Patients with a history of brain surgery
• Patients with severely limited neck joint range of motion (those with a limitation of 45 degrees or more)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

38 participants in 2 patient groups

Vestibular Rehabilitation Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

underwent vestibular rehabilitation program

Treatment:

Other: Vestibular Rehabilitation

Vestibular Rehabilitation and Vestibular Electrical Stimulation Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

underwent vestibular electrical stimulation (VES) in addition to the supervised vestibular rehabilitation program.

Treatment:

Other: Vestibular Electrical Stimulation

Other: Vestibular Rehabilitation