ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness or Orthopedic Intervention in Osteoporosis Management After a Fracture of the Hip With Cost-Benefit Analysis

S

Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Status

Completed

Conditions

Osteoporotic Fracture

Treatments

Procedure: Letter Group
Procedure: Intervention Group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02239523
201497CTIL

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patients who present with fragility fractures are consistently under-evaluated and under-treated for underlying osteoporosis. This point of care represents a lost opportunity to prevent future fractures. The medical field treats the fracture as if the fall is the problem, but bone quality is the real problem. Studies have consistently shown that the recommendations of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and World Health Organization are not being followed. Orthopedics treats the patients for their fractures and primary care physicians focus on general health but no one is taking responsibility for bone health. Strategies to convince primary care to assume care have not succeeded. On the other hand, strategies where orthopedics takes some responsibility have shown success. This prospective 2-arm study will evaluate the success of effort by an academic orthopedic department in osteoporosis evaluation and treatment. We hypothesize that with greater effort by the orthopedic department, the better the adherence to standards of care. A cost benefit analysis will be made in parallel.

Full description

Patients who present to the orthopedic department in a level I trauma center will be prospectively randomized into one of two groups:

Letter Group: At time of discharge, patients will be sent home with a discharge letter that includes standard recommendations for evaluation and treatment. They will be asked to give the letter to their primary care physician.

Intervention Group: There will be 4 interventions. The patient will be given a short pamphlet with explaining osteoporosis and the importance of treatment. The orthopedic department will perform a bone density testing (DEXA). They will be given a letter with a specific medication recommendation based on a protocol determined by our endocrinology department. They will be asked to give both DEXA and medication recommendation to their primary care doctor to initiate treatment. Finally, a research assistant will contact the patient monthly to encourage them to start treatment.

Enrollment

200 patients

Sex

All

Ages

50 to 120 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients over age 50 with fragility fracture defined as a fall from standing or walking position

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with metastatic cancer
  • Known metabolic bone disease
  • End-of-life care
  • Inability to provide consent
  • Known MRSA carriers
  • Fractures of the trochanter alone, shaft or peri-prosthetic fractures

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

200 participants in 2 patient groups

Letter Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients will be given discharge letter that includes recommendation to discuss further testing and treatment with their primary care physician.
Treatment:
Procedure: Letter Group
Intervention Group
Experimental group
Description:
Patients will be given a pamphlet about osteoporosis and importance of treatment, have a bone density test (DEXA) arranged, be given a specific medication recommendation and monthly followup phone calls.
Treatment:
Procedure: Intervention Group

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems