ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Asymmetric Rapid Maxillary Expansion on Dentoskeletal Structures in Mixed Dentition (ARME)

C

Celal Irgin

Status

Completed

Conditions

Asymmetric Maxillary Arch (Disorder)
Maxillary Anomaly
Cross Bite

Treatments

Device: A locked modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06486324
08102026

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this clinical trial was to determine the efficacy of a locked modified bonded acrylic rapid maxillary expansion appliance, also known as an asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME), in patients with a true unilateral posterior crossbite resulting from transversal maxillary deficiency in the mixed dentition.

Full description

A posterior crossbite (PCB) is defined as an abnormal transverse or inverse relationship between the posterior teeth and dentition of the upper and lower jaws. A full buccal segment PCB involves multiple teeth in the posterior dentition and usually represents a transverse size discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular relationships. This discrepancy is often caused by narrow or underdeveloped transverse dimensions of the maxillary halves. The underlying etiology of PCBs includes congenital, developmental, traumatic, or iatrogenic causes. Since spontaneous correction of this malocclusion is not possible even if the etiological factors are eliminated, it should be treated with maxillary expansion as early as possible.

The PCBs may be seen a unilateral posterior crossbite (UPCB) or bilateral posterior crossbite during all periods of dentition. A UPCB can be described as a functional UPCB or true UPCB. A functional UPCB is usually associated with a lateral shift of the mandible toward the crossbite side during the transition of the mandible. On the other hand, true UPCB is less common than functional UPCB and is caused by the narrowing of one of the maxillary halves. Increasing the maxillary arch transverse dimension is the main goal in the treatment of PCB. Although bilateral maxillary expansion is usually used to symmetrically widen the maxillary arch and eliminate mandibular shift as a standard treatment model in functional PCB, asymmetrical or unilateral maxillary expansion is recommended to expand narrowed sections of the maxillary halves and prevent overexpansion of the non-crossbite side in the treatment of true UPCB. Therefore, several removable or fixed maxillary expansion appliances that are slowly or rapidly activated were modified to produce differential effects on posterior teeth.

This clinical trial was designed to expand the upper jaw asymmetrically, i.e. to prevent the normal side of the bite from expanding while expanding the narrow part of the upper jaw. For this purpose, a locking mechanism was added to a bonded rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance to support the lower posterior teeth on the normal side of the bite.The hypothesis tested in the study was whether the true unilateral posterior cross-bite in the mixed dentition period could be corrected with a locked modified bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance used for asymmetric expansion.

Children aged between 7 and 10 years old with true unilateral posterior crossbite were enrolled in the study. The efficacy of the appliance was compared between the crossbite and non-crossbite sides in the patients included in the study. The crossbite side of the patients was assigned as the treatment group, while the normal bite or noncrossbite side was assigned as the positive control group. Thus, two groups were formed for the study, and the trial was conducted on these groups.In other words, the study was planned as a self-controlled study. A negative control group could not be formed due to ethical reason. The reason for this is that the transversal problem may negatively affect both the anterioposterior and vertical development of the jaws in patients of this age during the developmental period, and therefore it was deemed necessary to correct the cross-bite problem as soon as possible after it was detected.Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate specific dentoskeletal changes induced by treatment with true UPCB in mixed dentition with asymmetric RME.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

7 to 10 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • mixed dentition
  • true unilateral posterior crossbite
  • erupted first permanent molars and incisors
  • all deciduous canines and molars or no more than one missing deciduous molar
  • no history of orthodontic treatment
  • no systemic disease
  • no pathological periodontal status
  • no excessive gagging reflex.

Exclusion criteria

  • poor oral hygiene
  • caries

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Treatment Group
Experimental group
Description:
Crossbite Side
Treatment:
Device: A locked modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME)
Device: A locked modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME)
Positive Control Group
Experimental group
Description:
Non-cossbite Side
Treatment:
Device: A locked modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME)
Device: A locked modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance (ARME)

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems