Effects of Augmented Reality-based Rapid Blood Transfusion (Level-1®)

Samsung Medical Center

Status: Completed

Conditions: Equipment and Supplies; Augmented Reality; Nurse's Role

Treatments: Other: AR-based Training with Microsoft HoloLens 2®; Other: Traditional Guideline-based Self-Learning

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06506851

2023-06-084

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of AR-based training with traditional guideline-based self-learning in practical nurses without prior Level-1® experience. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2® improve clinical performance compared to traditional guideline-based self-learning? Does AR-based training affect self-efficacy and educational satisfaction compared to traditional methods?

Participants will:

Receive AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2® (experimental group) Follow traditional guideline-based self-learning (control group) Researchers will compare the AR-based training group to the traditional self-learning group to see if AR-based training leads to better clinical performance, higher self-efficacy, and greater educational satisfaction.

Full description

In critical situations like hypovolemic shock, nurses must master skills for using devices like the Level-1® rapid infusion system. However, limited exposure poses challenges. Augmented reality (AR) offers a solution by providing realistic practice scenarios. While AR has shown effectiveness in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation education, its application in Level-1® training remains underexplored.

This study was conducted at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea, and involved 42 practical nurses without prior Level-1® experience. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the experimental group, which received AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2®, and the control group, which followed traditional guideline-based self-learning.

The study aimed to investigate the impact of AR-based Level-1® education on nurses' clinical performance, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction. Clinical performance, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction were assessed through structured measurements.

Results data and conclusions drawn from the data are excluded from this section and will be reported separately in the Results Section of the record.

Enrollment: 42 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Willingness to participate voluntarily and understanding of the study's purpose.
• No prior experience with the Level-1® rapid infusion system.

Exclusion criteria

• Failure to meet the inclusion criteria.
• Prior experience with the Level-1® rapid infusion system.
• Inability to comprehend the study's purpose or express voluntary participation.
• Inability to attend required training and evaluations.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Other

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

42 participants in 2 patient groups

AR-based Training Group

Experimental group

Description:

Practical nurses in this arm receive AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2®. This training method incorporates augmented reality technology to provide immersive and interactive learning experiences, enhancing their proficiency in device utilization.

Treatment:

Other: AR-based Training with Microsoft HoloLens 2®

Traditional Self-Learning Group

Sham Comparator group

Description:

Practical nurses in this arm follow traditional guideline-based self-learning methods without augmented reality technology. They rely on conventional educational materials and guidelines for learning device utilization skills.

Treatment:

Other: Traditional Guideline-based Self-Learning