ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Function in Stroke Patients

B

Baskent University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Upper Extremity Paresis
Stroke
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Treatments

Device: tDCS
Device: sham tDCS

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03839316
KA15/271

Details and patient eligibility

About

Motor impairment (impairment of movement) due to stroke is one of the leading disabilities in adults. In addition to established means of facilitating motor recovery after stroke such as physical and occupational therapy, a variety of experimental rehabilitation approaches have been tested. Although there have been significant advances in stroke rehabilitation with these techniques and treatments, research on this subject is continuing. Recent studies have focused on non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) therapies, which are methods of non-invasive brain stimulation that may be effective on cerebral remodelling, aim to reestablish the disturbed balance between the anatomic areas of the brain seen in stroke patients.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applications on the upper extremity motor functions of patients with stroke.

Full description

Motor impairment due to ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke is one of the leading disabilities in adults. In addition to established means of facilitating motor recovery after stroke such as physical and occupational therapy, a variety of experimental rehabilitation approaches have been tested. Recent developments include noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The use of these tools is based on neurophysiologic studies demonstrating an imbalance of interhemispheric interactions which appears to interfere with the recovery process.

The model of interhemispheric imbalance provides a framework for developing hypotheses based on its 2 facets: 1) upregulating excitability of intact portions of the ipsilesional motor cortex and 2) downregulating excitability of the contralesional motor cortex to modulate its unrestrained inhibitory influence on ipsilesional regions. Studies to date have shown have shown the beneficial effects of tDCS on motor skills and motor learning.

Bihemispheric tDCS may potentiate the effects of anodal stimulation to the lesional hemisphere through additional modulation of interhemispheric interactions via cathodal stimulation to the contralesional motor cortex.

The primary aim of this prospective, randomized, sham controlled study is to evaluate the effectiveness of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applications on the upper extremity motor functions of patients with stroke.

Enrollment

32 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18-75 years old, female or male
  2. Clinical evaluation consistent with hemiplegia
  3. First time stroke with brain computerized tomography (CT) and / or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings consistent with stroke
  4. At least 3 months since stroke onset
  5. Presence of a stable medical condition
  6. Preserved cognitive function as determined by a mini mental state examination score of 23 and above

Exclusion criteria

  1. Presence of a sensory aphasia
  2. Presence of neglect syndrome
  3. A history of epilepsy
  4. Presence of a pacemaker
  5. Previous history of stroke
  6. History of previous cranial surgery
  7. Presence of a brain tumour
  8. Presence of an intracranial metallic implant
  9. Marked hearing / visual impairment
  10. Presence of severe spasticity (grade 3-4 according to the modified Ashworth scale)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

32 participants in 2 patient groups

tDCS group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Sixteen stroke patient receiving bihemispheric tDCS in addition to a conventional physiotherapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) program for five consecutive days per week for a three week period (a total of fifteen sessions). The one hour long conventional PT sessions will include an upper extremity range of motion, strengthening and neurofacilitation exercise program. The one hour long OT sessions will include task specific exercises chosen according to the patient's functional status, including activities aimed at improving gross and fine motor function of the upper extremities. The tDCS application will be applied at the beginning of each OT session and will be continued for a total of thirty minutes at 2 mA.
Treatment:
Device: tDCS
Sham group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Sixteen stroke patient receiving a conventional PT and OT program and sham tDCS for 5 consecutive days per week for a 3 week period ( a total of 15 sessions). The one hour long conventional PT and OT sessions will be the same as in the tDCS group. For sham tDCS, electrode application and positioning will be the same as the intervention group and will be applied at the beginning of each OT session as previously described. The current will initially be increased up to 2 mA, so to provide the typical initial tingling sensation, and slowly decreased over 30 seconds and consequently switched off. The electrodes will be removed after a total of thirty minutes.
Treatment:
Device: sham tDCS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems