ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Coherent Breathing Breathwork on Health

U

University of Sussex

Status

Completed

Conditions

Depressive Symptoms
Wellbeing
Sleep Disturbance
Anxiety
Stress

Treatments

Behavioral: Coherent breathing
Behavioral: Placebo coherent breathing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05676658
Sussex coherent breath study

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators are conducting a randomised-controlled trial comparing coherent breathing at ~5.5 breath cycles per minute-bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of ~5.5secs each) to a well-designed placebo (paced breathing at 12bcpm with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of 2.5secs each). The metric of 12bcpm is in line with guidance from the British Journal of Nursing, Royal College of Physicians, and Johns Hopkins University which state that the average, healthy bcpm should range from: 12-20bcpm, 12-18bcpm, and 12-16bcpm, respectively, hence the investigators chose the minimum/lower bound for the active placebo control group. The main questions that our study attempts to address are: Does coherent breathing (and placebo coherent breathing) lead to improved mental health and wellbeing in a general population adult sample?

The study will be conducted entirely online through the research platform Prolific, so participant data will be anonymous. The investigators will collect self-reports of mental health and wellbeing before and after the four-week breathwork period, along with a follow-up one-month later. Pre-post intervention and follow-up questionnaires will be completed online via the survey platform Qualtrics which will be linked to Prolific. Participants will also be asked how many times they practiced out of the assigned 28 days, to gauge self-reported adherence to the protocol. The investigators can then observe whether self-reported adherence correlates with changes in mental health and wellbeing, if any. Data on the self-reported credibility/expectancy of the breathwork randomly allocated to participants will also be collected, along with open-ended responses on participants' overall experience of the protocol/study.

Enrollment

400 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria (self-assessed):

  • 18+ years of age (18 is the automatic minimum age on Prolific)
  • Able to breathe through nose
  • Have access to headphones
  • The following pre-screeners on Prolific will also be set so only those eligible on Prolific will see the study: Located/living in UK, Fluent in English, approval rate of 98% and at least 20 previous submissions (as recommended by Prolific to increase retention and reduce dropout rates in longitudinal and multi-part studies)

Exclusion Criteria (self-assessed):

  • Any problems which affect ones ability to pace their breathing (i.e., active/chronic respiratory infection including blocked nose/cough/cold/fever, etc.), breathlessness, cardiovascular problems, respiratory conditions or diseases (i.e., uncontrolled symptomatic asthma, COPD, lung cancer, etc.), abnormally slow breathing (bradypnea), or abnormally fast breathing (tachypnoea)
  • Any other physical/mental health conditions or current life events which impair or affect ones ability to engage in activities involving breath control

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

400 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Coherent breathing
Experimental group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Coherent breathing
Placebo coherent breathing
Placebo Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Placebo coherent breathing

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems