Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete loss of airflow during sleep, due to narrowing or closure of the upper airway. The resulting hypoxia has many cardiometabolic consequences, and leads to a disruption of sleep quality including reductions in the expression of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and slow wave sleep (SWS). Patients also frequently experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which, when present with OSA, defines the clinical entity OSA syndrome (OSAS). Obesity is the leading risk factor for the development of OSA. Interestingly, it has been suggested that the disorder itself may contribute to further weight gain, presenting a vicious cycle wherein OSA and obesity perpetuate each other. OSAS may promote weight gain by placing patients in a state of positive energy balance characterized by low levels of physical activity and disrupted patterns of appetite-regulating hormones. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the gold-standard treatment of OSAS, may improve energy balance in these patients, although this has not yet been adequately studied. The current proposal will investigate the effects of 2 months of CPAP on energy balance and cardiovascular risk in obese patients with OSA. Patients will be instructed to use CPAP at home each night throughout the 2-month treatment phases. At baseline and at the conclusion of the 2-month treatment phase, the investigators will measure levels of free-living physical activity, sleepiness, sleep quality, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors, appetite-regulating hormones, hunger, and ad libitum food intake. There will also be a control group with OSA individuals studied at baseline and again after 2 months with no CPAP use. It is hypothesized that CPAP compared to no treatment treatment will result in improvements in energy balance, including increased physical activity, reductions in abnormally high levels of circulating leptin levels, and reductions in hunger, food intake, and cardiovascular risk factors. These improvements are hypothesized to be associated with increases in the expression of REM sleep and SWS, and reduced EDS as a result of CPAP.
Full description
This study investigates the effects of 2 mo of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on physical activity, energy intake (EI), and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Patients will be instructed to use CPAP at home each night throughout the 2 mo treatment phase. Before and after the 2 mo treatment phase, patients will undergo a 1-d in-lab testing period at the Clinical Research Resource (CRR) at Columbia University Medical Center. Upon completion of the laboratory phase 1, patients will return home for a 2 mo treatment period, followed by the second tracking period including laboratory visit 2.
Before and at the conclusion of the 2 mo treatment phase, patients will enter the laboratory at the Columbia University Medical Center for a 1-d period. Patients will arrive at ~0800 h and will remain in the laboratory for the following 24 h. Blood will be sampled in the fasting state in the morning, and will be assayed for select appetite-regulating hormones (leptin, ghrelin, adiponectin, glucagon-like peptide-1). We will also assess body composition. During the laboratory day, ad libitum EI will be measured for each treatment phase. Breakfast, lunch, snack, and dinner will be served at the standard times, but each meal item will be served in excess such that patients will be able to eat as much or as little of each food as they choose. Additional snack choices will also be freely available during the wake episode.
There will also be a control group of individuals with OSA who do not use CPAP who are studied at baseline and again after a 2 month period in procedures similar to those undergoing treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
29 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal