Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) based exercises and balance exercises on functional capacity, balance, muscle strength, and quality of life in older adults.
Full description
Aging leads to a decline in postural control, muscle strength, balance, and functional capacity, increasing the risk of falls and negatively impacting quality of life. Therefore, investigating the effectiveness of exercise approaches targeting neuromuscular control and stability in older adults is of great importance.
Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) is a developmental kinesiology-based approach that aims to reactivate the deep stabilizer system, promote diaphragmatic breathing, and restore optimal movement patterns. Traditional balance exercises are commonly used in older adults to improve balance performance. However, evidence regarding the effects of DNS exercises on functional capacity, balance, and quality of life in older adults is limited.
The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization exercises and traditional balance exercises on functional capacity, balance, and quality of life in older adults. Individuals aged 65 and over will be included in the study and randomized into two groups: a DNS exercise group and a balance exercise group.
Functional capacity and physical performance assessments will be conducted using the Hand Grip Strength Test, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and Timed Up and Walk Test. Trunk stability and deep stabilizer system activation will be assessed using the Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback (SPB) device. Physical activity level will be measured using the Physical Activity Assessment Scale for the Elderly, and quality of life will be measured using the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale. All assessments will be conducted before the intervention and after the exercise program.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
18 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Elif Develi, PhD C
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal