Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effects of electric and manual toothbrushes on periodontal health parameters and salivary microbial flora in children with fixed and removable space maintainers.
Materials and methods: Sixty-eight children (30 girls, 38 boys; mean age 8.8 years) requiring fixed (n=34) or removable (n=34) space maintainers were randomly allocated to electric (n=17) or manual (n=17) toothbrush subgroups. Periodontal indices; plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2).
Full description
A total of 68 patients (thirty girls and thirty-eight boys), aged between 6 and 12 years (mean age 8.8), who received either fixed or removable space maintainers due to premature loss of primary molar teeth, were included in the study.
Patients were randomized into two groups based on the type of space maintainer: fixed (n = 34) or removable (n = 34). Each group was further subdivided according to the type of toothbrush used: manual or electric, resulting in four subgroups (n=17). To standardize the study population, only band-and-loop appliances were used in the fixed space maintainer group, which were cemented using a fluoride-releasing glass ionomer cement (RelyX; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Removable space maintainers consisted of an acrylic base with retention elements such as Adams' clasps, C clasps, or vestibular archesPatients in the removable space maintainer group were instructed to use their appliances during the day, except while eating and sleeping, and to clean them by brushing after toothbrushing.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
84 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal