ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis

U

University of Catania

Status

Invitation-only

Conditions

Peri Implant Mucositis
Mucositis

Treatments

Other: Enamel Matrix Proteins Derivative
Other: Placebo gel

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06725095
2024-3306

Details and patient eligibility

About

To evaluate the naturally occurring peri-implant mucositis (PM) treatment by means of non-surgical sub-marginal peri-implant instrumentation (NSPI) with or without use of enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD). Specifically, the primary outcome of the present study compared the efficacy of NSPI +EMD with respect to NSPI and placebo in the treatment of PM at 6 months follow-up by means of BOP reduction. The secondary outcome evaluated the influence of possible predictors on the BOP changes among all follow-up sessions.

Full description

Patients (n° 54) with Implants affected by PM were randomly assigned to test (NSMD+EMD) or control procedures (NSMD + placebo). At baseline, 1, 3, 6 months, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified gingival index (mGI), and modified plaque index (mPlI) will assessed as well as levels of periodontal bacteria such as Aggregatibacter Actynomycencomitans, Porphyromonas Gingivalis, Tannerella Forsythia and Treponema Denticola. The BOP reduction was set as a primary outcome and the patient was considered statistical unit. Data were analysed to assess BOP reduction at a 6-month follow-up and to identify significant predictors of implant-site BOP through mixed generalized linear regression.

Enrollment

54 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥18 years old;
  • implants with smooth necks supporting cemented or screw-retained single-unit crowns with at least one BOP-positive site (Berglundh et al., 2018),
  • implants placed in both maxilla and mandible
  • patients with gingivitis or treated periodontitis with the absence of residual PD ≥5 mm
  • presence at least of 2 mm of keratinized mucosa (KT) at implant sites

Exclusion criteria

  • presence of systemic diseases;
  • pregnancy or lactating;
  • use of inflammatory drugs or antibiotics within 3 months prior to study recruitment;
  • implants with modified (i.e., micro-rough) necks;
  • interproximal open contacts between implant restoration and adjacent teeth; peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

54 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Placebo Comparator: non-surgical sub-marginal peri-implant instrumentation (NSPI) with placebo gel
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Patients received a one-session of non-surgical sub-marginal peri-implant instrumentation (NSPI) with placebo
Treatment:
Other: Placebo gel
non-surgical sub-marginal peri-implant instrumentation (NSPI) with EMD
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients received a one-session of non-surgical sub-marginal peri-implant instrumentation (NSPI) with EMD
Treatment:
Other: Enamel Matrix Proteins Derivative

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems