Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration Versus Whole Upper Limb Vibration in Post-Stroke Patients

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Stroke; Post Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

Treatments: Other: Upper limb vibration through whole body vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation; Other: Focal muscle vibration through focal muscle vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07340034

UBAS/ERB/FoRS/25/036

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on rehabilitation strategies for post-stroke patients, specifically focusing on the efficacy of vibration therapy modalities. By comparing focal muscle vibration therapy and whole upper limb vibration therapy, the research aims to provide empirical evidence that can inform clinical practices and enhance rehabilitation outcomes. The findings are expected to clarify which modality is more effective in reducing spasticity and improving motor control, thereby guiding clinicians in selecting appropriate interventions tailored to individual patient needs, increasing chances of benefits, time management and useful for academic purpose. Furthermore, the study addresses a critical gap in the literature, facilitating further research and discussion on the mechanisms underlying vibration therapy's effects.

Ultimately, this research aims to reduce spasticity and improve community outcomes by enhancing the quality of life for stroke survivors, enabling them to regain independence and participate more fully in daily activities by regaining the motor control functions. By contributing to both theoretical and practical frameworks, the study seeks to advance the field of neurorehabilitation and support informed decision-making among healthcare professionals.

Full description

Motor impairment post-stroke, which usually affects the movement of the face, arm, and leg on one side of the body, impacts approximately 80% of individuals who have experienced a stroke. Upper limb motor impairments (involving the arm, hand, and/or fingers) are often long-lasting and debilitating; only about half of stroke survivors with an initially paralyzed upper limb recover some useful function within six months.

Recently, mechanical vibrations have been utilized as a form of somatosensory stimulation to enhance motor function and to address muscle spasticity in the upper limbs following a stroke. When applying vibration stimuli during exercise or physical rehabilitation, these can be broadly classified into two categories: (a) vibrations that are directly applied to a specific muscle or tendon, and (b) indirect vibrations that are not limited to a specific muscle, delivered either through the feet while standing on a platform or through the hands using a handheld device. The direct application of vibrations to a muscle or tendon is often referred to as focal muscle vibration (FMV) or segmental vibration (SV), and it may also be called repetitive muscle vibration (rMV). In contrast, indirect vibrations delivered through the hands are typically known as upper limb vibration (ULV), while those aimed at the lower limbs are referred to as whole-body vibration (WBV).

Vibration therapy (VT) is a form of physical therapy that employs mechanical vibration waves to stimulate the human neuromuscular system for therapeutic benefits. It demonstrates promising potential for use in the rehabilitation of dysfunctions part of bosy resulting from a stroke.

Focal muscle vibration (FMV) OR segmental muscle vibration is a relatively new approach used to enhance motor function and reduce spasticity in the hemiplegic upper limb of stroke patients. In FMV, a vibratory stimulus is delivered to a specific muscle tendon via a mechanical device, which activates the muscle spindle primary endings and generates Ia inputs. Vibration applied to a muscle can elevate the motor-evoked potential recorded from that muscle at rest, indicating an increase in corticospinal excitability during the vibration. Additionally, studies have shown that the duration of the cortical silent period in a forearm flexor muscle can increase when the antagonist forearm extensors are vibrated, providing strong evidence that pure sensory stimulation can influence motor cortical excitability.

Enrollment: 54 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 45 to 60 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA Clinical diagnosis of first-ever ischemic stroke Age from 45 to 60 years Both male and female participants Onset of stroke 3 month to 6 months previously Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score for the upper limb muscles on the hemiparetic side between 1+ and 3 Able to follow verbal commands and sign informed consent forms EXCLUSION CRITERIA Cardiovascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes Upper limb muscle contracture on the affected side Peripheral neuropathy Uncontrolled hypertension Malignant tumors Uncontrolled seizures Dementia

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

54 participants in 2 patient groups

Focal muscle vibration through focal muscle vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation

Experimental group

Description:

Group A will receive the Focal muscle vibration in the major group of muscle such as Elbow flexors and wrist flexors along with the conventional neurorehabilitation.

Treatment:

Other: Focal muscle vibration through focal muscle vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation

Upper limb vibration through whole body vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Group B will receive the upper limb vibration which will include all muscles of effected limb along with the conventional neurorehabilitation.

Treatment:

Other: Upper limb vibration through whole body vibrator along with conventional neurorehabilitation