ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Foot Medial Arch Electrical Stimulation on Foot Functions and Balance

L

La Tour Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Healthy

Treatments

Device: TENS
Device: NMES

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04421794
2020 - 00533

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate effects of sole session of foot medial arch' NMES on foot strength, arch stability, static plantar pressure distribution and dynamic postural balance.

Full description

The study design is a randomised controlled trial in population with pronated feet. The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate effects of sole session of foot medial arch' NMES on foot strength, arch stability, static plantar pressure distribution and dynamic postural balance. This is the 2nd study to investigate the effect one session as previous study showed immediate effect on plantar pressure distribution on the midfoot and durable effect at 2 months follow-up. However, no studies investigated the effects on others parameters than plantar pressure.The general objective of our study is to question electrical stimulation as a modality for foot strengthening to enhance dynamic postural balance and foot functions.

Enrollment

48 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Foot Posture Index (FPI) between +6 à +12 (slight pronation / increased pronation)

Exclusion criteria

  • History of ankle or foot sprain or pain within the last 3 months
  • Fracture in the leg or in the foot that occurred during the last year
  • Severe foot deformity
  • Self-reported disability due to neuromuscular impairment in the lower extremity
  • Neurological or vestibular impairment that affected balance (diabetes mellitus, lumbosacral radiculopathy, a soft tissue disorder such as Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
  • Any absolute contraindication to NMES (pacemaker, seizure disorders, pregnancy)
  • Experience of NMES at the foot region or foot core strengthening

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

48 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

NMES group
Experimental group
Description:
For the NMES group one portable stimulator (Compex 2, Medicompex SA, Ecublens, Switzerland) will deliver NEMS (15 min; 75 EMS contractions completed during the training session; rise time = 0.25 s and descending time = 0.75 s). In order to maximize muscle tension without accompanying detrimental effects on fatigue onset, biphasic symmetric regular-wave pulsed currents (85 Hz) lasting 400 μs will be delivered. Each 4-s steady tetanic stimulation will be followed by pause lasting 8-s, during which subjects will be submaximally stimulated at 4 Hz on the medial arch muscles. According to the recommendations, the two electrodes are placed behind the head of the first metatarsal to stimulate the medial arch intrinsic muscles. The goal is to attain the highest tolerable level of muscle contraction without discomfort during the 15 minutes and to provide a full tetanic contraction of the intrinsic foot muscles during the contraction time.
Treatment:
Device: NMES
Control group
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
For the control group the one portable stimulator (Compex 2, Medicompex SA, Ecublens, Switzerland) will be used to apply a stimulation of 15 minutes considered by TENS at the lowest intensity detectable by the participant in order to not influence the outcomes of interest. Our aim is to strengthen IFM which is not the role of TENS. The two electrodes will be placed on the dominant foot, at the same place than those for the NMES group.
Treatment:
Device: TENS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems