Effects Of Inversion Table Therapy Vs MT On Pain And Lumbar Flexibility In Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Superior University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Treatments

Combination Product: Mulligan flexion biased exercises

Combination Product: Inversion Table

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07055802

MSRSW/Batch-Fall23/830

Details and patient eligibility

About

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a widespread yet difficult-to-manage and treat public health condition with a significant treatment failure rate. Both inversion table therapy and mulligan techniques are very effective in reducing low back pain. A number of literature supports the effectiveness of both techniques individually but there is no literature available that provide comparison between these two techniques.

Full description

Study objective will be to compare the effect of inversion table therapy versus mulligan techniques on pain and lumber flexibility in patients with chronic low back pain

Enrollment

54 patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Both Genders.
Adults aged between 30-50.
Low Back pain should be Persistent for more than 3 months
Idiopathic pain

Exclusion criteria

Pregnant females
Patients with cauda equina syndrome (symptoms of bladder impairments)
Cardiovascular disease in last 6 months
Any progressive neurological deficit (like stroke and epilepsy)
Patients history of vertigo and glaucoma
Patient with flexion biased pain Persistent use of pain medication
Patients who had undergone any other treatments, such as acupuncture or physical therapy, in last 3 months.