ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Kaltenborn Versus Mulligan Techniques in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

R

Riphah International University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatments

Other: Mulligan
Other: Kaltenborn

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06459453
REC/RCR&AHS/23/01109

Details and patient eligibility

About

This project was a randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of kaltenborn versus mulligan techniques on pain ,range of motion and functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist The inflammatory polyarthritis that primarily affects the tiny joints is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic autoimmune illness. It is characterized by synovial joint degeneration, joint swelling, and joint discomfort, which can result in disability and early death .All patients of chronic stage,convenience sampling technique was used,subjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore ,were randomly allocated into two groups ,baseline assessment was done.Group A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy.Group B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy.Post intervention assessment was done via,VAS(visual analogue scale),goniometric measurements of wrist ranges,and QUICK DASH score.3 sessions per week were given,Data was analyzed by using SPSS.

Full description

Rheumatoid arthritis is among the most commonly reported problems to physicians, orthopedics and physical therapist.Even before reporting to clinics there is a long history of using over the counter pain killers.Pain avoidance behaviors let the joint stiff so much that a clinician help is sought.Most times the cause of rheumatoid arthritis is not known therefore it is term as "autoimmune disorder".There is a vast literature regarding the management of rheumatoid arthritis and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in the treatment plan.In modern age of health care it is common goal of every health care to make patient self sufficient as early as possible .The self care model has new treatment protocols All patients of chronic stage,convenience sampling technique was used, subjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore ,were randomly allocated into two groups ,baseline assessment was done. Group A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy .Group B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy. Post intervention assessment was done via,VAS(visual analogue scale),goniometric measurements of wrist ranges ,and QUICK DASH score.3 sessions per week were given,Data was analyzed by using SPSS. .This study has compared the effectiveness of kaltenborn versus mulligan mobilization on pain,range of motion and functional disabilty in patients with rheumatoid arthitis of the wrist.The current study was narrative in a way that in literature there is no comparison of two different mobilizations about treating rheumatoid arthritis.These two mobilizations were employed to see which is more effective to improve pain,range of motion and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist.

Enrollment

34 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 18 to 65 years. Patients with less than 15degrees of flexion and 30 degrees of extension.
  • Male and female both are included.
  • Patients with chronic RA.
  • Consider only those patients with Ra factor positive. Patients with less than 10degrees of radial deviation and 15 degrees of ulnar deviation.
  • Patients willing to participate in the whole treatment session and follow up.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who had any mental illness (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, Dementia etc)
  • Patients who had any neurological deficit(paresthesia ,sensory loss, radiculopathy ,myleopathy)
  • Peripheral vascular diseases.
  • Any history of surgery related to upper limb.
  • Patients having metal implants in the upper limbs. Patients with any other serious pathology .

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

34 participants in 2 patient groups

Kaltenborn Technique
Active Comparator group
Description:
Per participant was randomized to receive weekly low grade Kaltenborn manual mobilization(grade I).Any tightening of the connective tissues surrounding the joint gave (grade II) and oscillations followed by additional stretching gave (grade III).For wrist joints, Kaltenborn mobilization was performed to improve wrist flexion, extension ,radial and ulnar deviation.The duration of intervention will be 4 weeks,3 sessions per week, a total of 12 sessions will be given to the study participants.Each session will be last for 30 minutes .Conventional physical therapy will be given to the participants along with the kaltenborn mobilization.
Treatment:
Other: Kaltenborn
Mulligan Technique
Experimental group
Description:
Per participant gave concurrent application of sustained accessory mobilization applied by a therapist and an active physiological movement to end range applied by the patient . Mulligan mobilization was performed for wrist flexion and extension,(in the form of a fist)MCP joint flexion and extension,Thumb IC joint flexion and extension ,abduction and adduction of fingers.. The duration of intervention will be 4 weeks,3 sessions per week, a total of 12 sessions will be given to the study participants . Each session will last for 30 minutes .Conventional physical therapy will be given to the participants along with mulligan mobilization.
Treatment:
Other: Mulligan

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Imran Amjad, PhD; Imran Amjad, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems