ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Kinesio Taping in Addition to Routine Physical Therapy on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome

U

University of Lahore

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cervical Pain

Treatments

Other: Kinesio Taping Technique
Other: Routine Physical Therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05191043
IRB-UOL-FAHS/998/2021

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objective of the study is to compare the effects of kinesio taping and routine physical therapy on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome.It is a single blinded randomized controlled trial using non probability purposive sampling technique.

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS:

There is a significant difference in the effects of routine physical therapy with and without kinesio taping on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome.

NULL HYPOTHESIS:

There is no significant difference in the effects of routine physical therapy with and without kinesio taping on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with upper cross syndrome.

Full description

It will be a prospectively registered ,parallel designed, randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation. Subjects will be selected from the outpatient Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital,Lahore, Pakistan. Patients who met eligibility criteria will be informed about the aim of study.all the eligible participants who will agree to participate will sign a consent form. After baseline assessment selected participants will be divided into 2 groups by random allocation method.Subjects will be randomized into two groups using computer generated random numbers.The outcome assessor will be unaware of treatment given to both groups.The calculated sample size using Numeric pain rating scale as outcome measure is 28 in each group, but after adding 20% dropout, the sample size will be 28+6=34 in each group, allowing statistical power of 80%and alpha level of 5%.

Enrollment

68 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 40 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Both gender
  • Participants with an age between 18 to 40
  • Participants diagnosed with chronic upper cross syndrome by orthopedic department for physical therapy treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Trauma, Tumor and Fracture of upper limb and shoulder
  • Congenital deformities of upper limb
  • History of any systemic disease
  • History of any neurological disease (epilepsy &seizure, Parkinson's disease)
  • History of recent surgery of spine or shoulder

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

68 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A/ kinesio taping group
Experimental group
Description:
Routine physical therapy along with Kinesio Taping
Treatment:
Other: Routine Physical Therapy
Other: Kinesio Taping Technique
Group B/ routine physical therapy
Active Comparator group
Description:
routine physical therapy
Treatment:
Other: Routine Physical Therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems