Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Stress generated during the curriculum might have deleterious effects on the wellbeing and the health of medical students. Objective and Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) will be incorporated soon in the certification process as a final national undergraduate ranking examination. This exam will be an additional major stressor for medical students.
Stress coping strategies could be implemented to help them better prepare for this examination. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency on stress reduction of three different 6-minutes coping interventions in medical student, few minutes prior to the OSCE.
Full description
This randomized, controlled and monocentric study will be conducted during the OSCE tests contributing towards the final exam grades for 4th year medicine students at the Claude Bernard Lyon 1 university.All the students will receive information for the study and sign consent before being randomized into four interventions groups. All the interventions will last six minutes long.
The randomisation groups are:
Psychological stress will be measured using short questionnaires and self-rated Visual Analogue Scale (from 0 to 100mm) regarding perceived stress, answered by students before and after intervention. For measuring physiological stress, all the student will be equipped with emWAve® devices that allows us to record heart rate variability during the time of intervention. Students will also answer a questionnaire of personality.
Main objective is to show that interventions are better than control to reduce stress level before OSCE.
The main outcome is to compare the effect of the interventions on physiological stress, using HRV as physiological stress marker.
Secondary outcomes are to compare the effects of the interventions on psychological stress and to compare the specified aspect of the intervention. Finally, our project will permit to assess if the personality modulates the effectiveness of the intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
490 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Marc Lilot, PhD; Sophie Schlatter
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal