ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects Of Muscle Energy Versus Counter Strain Technique on Pain, Function and Satisfaction Level in Planter Fasciitis

U

University of Lahore

Status

Completed

Conditions

Plantar Fasciitis

Treatments

Other: Counterstrain Technique
Other: Muscle Energy Technique

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05424341
Taliah Bashir Sindhu

Details and patient eligibility

About

Previous studies has discussed the effects of muscle energy technique and counterstrain technique in upper trapezius and low back pain but no comparative study is found on planter fasciitis patients. In this study we are going to compare the effects of muscle energy technique and counterstrain technique with routine physical therapy in relation with pain, functional status and satisfaction level in planter fasciitis patients

Full description

Heel pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal diseases of the lower limb, affecting both physically active and sedentary people. Amongst the possible causes, planter fasciitis is one of the most common cause of heel pain.

Planter fasciitis is a degenerative syndrome resulting from the repeated injury at its origin on the calcaneus. Its most common symptom is discomfort in the plantar area of the foot and, more specifically, in the inferior part of the heel. It is frequently more intense while taking your first steps in the morning or after a period of physical inactivity, and it worsens with prolonged standing or weight-lifting activities. It is not frequently linked to nocturnal discomfort or paresthesia.

Different physiotherapy treatment conventions help in pain relieving for example, rest, taping, stretching, orthosis-night brace, Silicon heel cups and myofascial release. This study will compare the effects of Muscle Energy Technique versus Counterstrain Technique in patients with plantar Fasciitis.

Enrollment

66 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 68 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20 to 68 years.

    • Both male and female.
    • Patients are clinical diagnosed by the orthopedic surgeon.
    • Patients present with pain that persist for more than 4 weeks in heel and planter surface of foot.
    • Pain with the first steps after inactivity

Exclusion criteria

  • • Patients with history of ankle and foot fracture.

    • Congenital or acquired deformity of ankle and foot.
    • Patients with arthritis.
    • Pervious history of surgery for planter fasciitis.
    • Patients use an assistive device for walking.
    • Patients use corticosteroid injection in heel.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

66 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A
Experimental group
Description:
This group will receive muscle energy technique along with routine physical therapy. This protocol will be given for 3 alternative days for 2 weeks . Each session will be of 50 mins. Data will be collected at baseline , at 1st week and at 2nd week.
Treatment:
Other: Muscle Energy Technique
Group B
Active Comparator group
Description:
This group will receive counterstrain technique along with routine physical therapy. This protocol will be given for 3 alternative days for 2 weeks . Each session will be of 50 mins. Data will be collected at baseline , at 1st week and at 2nd week.
Treatment:
Other: Counterstrain Technique

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems