Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To examine the neurobehavioural responses to two successive cycles of sleep restriction and recovery in adolescents, and to determine the benefits of napping on cognitive performance, alertness, and mood. 57 participants, aged 15 to 19 years old, were divided into nap and no-nap groups. Both groups underwent two cycles of sleep restriction and recovery over 15 days. The nap group received an afternoon sleep opportunity lasting 1 hour.
Full description
57 participants (aged 15 to 19 years old) were grouped into nap and no nap groups. Both groups took part in a 15-day protocol that started with 2 9-hour adaptation and baseline nights, followed by two successive cycles of sleep restriction (5-h time-in-bed [TIB]; 01:00-06:00) and recovery (9-h TIB; 23:00-08:00) intended to simulate the weekday sleep loss and weekend attempt to 'catch up' that are familiar to high school students. The nap group received a 1-hour nap opportunity at 14:00 following each sleep-restricted night, while participants in the no nap group watched a documentary. Sleep was monitored with polysomnography on 9 selected nights. Cognitive performance, subjective sleepiness, and mood were assessed 3 times daily (10:00, 15:45, and 20:00).
All participants stayed in air-conditioned, twin-share bedrooms with en-suite bathrooms. Bedroom windows were fitted with blackout panels to ensure participants were not woken up prematurely by sunlight. Earplugs were also provided, and participants were allowed to adjust the temperature of their bedrooms to their personal comfort. 3 main meals were served each day, with snacks being provided for upon request. Caffeinated drinks, unscheduled sleep, and strenuous physical activities were prohibited.
Outside of scheduled sleep, meal, and cognitive testing times, participants spent the majority of their free time in a common room that was illuminated by natural and artificial lighting. They were allowed to read, play non-physically exerting games, watch videos, and interact with research staff and other participants. Participants were under constant supervision by the research staff.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
57 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal