ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Plant-based Meat Alternatives in Comparison to Chicken Meat on Postprandial Metabolism in Healthy Adults

U

University of Bonn

Status

Completed

Conditions

Postprandial Metabolic Events
Plasma Amino Acid Appearance and Disappearance

Treatments

Other: Chicken
Other: Wheat protein
Other: Pea protein
Other: Soy protein

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06618729
AlProPlant-HS2

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to investigate the postprandial metabolic responses to plant-based meat alternatives made from different protein ingredients (pea, wheat or soy protein) in comparison to chicken in healthy adults. Therefore, young healthy subjects consume 4 test meals with 40 g of protein from pea protein, wheat protein, soy protein or chicken in a randomized order. In a postprandial period of 6 hours, parameters of protein, glucose and lipid metabolism (i.a. plasma amino acids), gastric emptying and hunger/satiety are analysed. It is assumed that the plasma amino acid profile after plant protein ingestion differs depending on protein source and in comparison to chicken protein.

Full description

In a randomized crossover-design, 20 healthy women and men consume 4 test meals containing either 40 g of protein from plant-based meat alternatives (pea, wheat and soy protein extrudate) or chicken together with 1 g paracetamol, which is used as a marker for gastric emptying.

During a postprandial period of 6 hours parameters of protein metabolism (e.g. amino acids in plasma and urine), glucose metabolism (e.g. plasma glucose, serum insulin), lipid metabolism (serum triglycerides, total cholesterol , LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, free fatty acids), serum uric acids, hunger- and satiety-associated gastrointestinal hormones (serum ghrelin, plasma GLP-1), and gastric emptying rate (based on plasma paracetamol) are analysed. Furthermore, subjective hunger/satiety and acceptance of the meals are assed using visual analogue scales. Each intervention arm will be separated by a washout period of at least 7 days.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non-smoking
  • metabolically healthy
  • normal weight (BMI: 18,5 - 24,9 kg/m2)
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • pregnancy, lactation
  • hypo- or hypertension
  • underweight or overweight/obesity
  • food intolerances and allergies (especially soy, pea, wheat/gluten)
  • malabsorption syndromes
  • gastrointestinal diseases
  • thyroid diseases
  • diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2
  • impaired kidney or liver function
  • anaemia
  • blood coagulation disorders
  • irregular menstrual cycle
  • endometriosis, severe menstrual problems
  • hormonal contraception
  • regular use of medications (especially habitual use of paracetamol or medications that may interact with paracetamol)
  • hypersensitivity to paracetamol
  • body weight below 50 kg
  • alcohol abuse
  • glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Gilbert's syndrome
  • eating disorders (especially anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa)
  • smoking
  • participation in another study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 4 patient groups

Pea protein
Experimental group
Description:
Participants randomized to receive a meal containing 40 g of protein from pea protein extrudate
Treatment:
Other: Pea protein
Wheat protein
Experimental group
Description:
Participants randomized to receive a meal containing 40 g of protein from wheat protein extrudate
Treatment:
Other: Wheat protein
Soy protein
Experimental group
Description:
Participants randomized to receive a meal containing 40 g of protein from soy protein extrudate
Treatment:
Other: Soy protein
Chicken
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants randomized to receive a meal containing 40 g of protein from chicken meat
Treatment:
Other: Chicken

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Sarah Egert, Prof PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems