Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to investigate and compare the effect of PRF and vitamin Dꝫ injections on root resorption by using CBCT
Full description
Group 1 (PRF group): upper canine retraction will be facilitated by PRF injection that will be randomly assigned to one side (experimental side). The contralateral side will serve as the control one.
Group II (Vitamin Dꝫ group): canine retraction will be facilitated by Vitamin Dꝫ injection that will be randomly assigned to one side (experimental side). The contralateral side will serve as the control one.
Simple randomization will be designed with the aid of a computer-generated schedule with 1:1 allocation ratio. Allocation concealment will be achieved using identical opaque, sealed envelopes. Randomization and allocation concealment will be performed by one of the academic staff who will not be involved in the study and will keep the allocation table away from the operators. The operator will shuffle the sealed envelopes and will ask the patient to pick one envelope at the time of recruitment. In each group, a randomly selected side will act as the experimental side while the contralateral side will serve as the control. Blinding of the operators will not be applicable and so blinding will be limited to the outcome assessment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
IInclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
14 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Walid Salem; Rehab Khalil
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal