ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training on Tongue Muscle Function

U

Université Catholique de Louvain

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Healthy

Treatments

Device: Sham
Device: EMT
Device: IMT

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06627283
RMT-TONGUE

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training on tongue muscle function in healthy subjects. We hypothesize that respiratory muscle training can improve strength and endurance of the tongue muscles.

Full description

In patient with obstructive sleep apnea, studies have shown that respiratory muscle training improved sleep-related outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). On the other hand, a recent study showed that expiratory muscle training improved tongue motor strength in patients with OSA. We hypothesize that respiratory muscle training (either Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) or Expiratory Muscle Training (EMT)) may elicit sleep-related improvement in patient with OSA through enhancement on tongue muscle function.

To investigate our hypothesis, we will first address this question in a population of healthy subjects. This study will therefore investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training on tongue muscle function in healthy subjects. The primary hypothesis is that the IMT program with lead to an increase in tongue strength compared to the control group. Other hypothesizes are that EMT, but not sham, will also lead to an increase in tongue strength, compared to the control group.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Community ambulant adults between 18 to 65 years old as of testing day; able to understand French or Dutch (depending on the study's site of inclusion); BMI ≥ 18 and ≤ 30 kg/m².

Exclusion criteria

Any diagnosed neuromuscular or cardiorespiratory disease; diagnosed psychiatric or psychological disorders which could affect adherence to or comprehension of instructions; diagnosed eating disorders; previous or ongoing head and neck cancer; diagnosed OSA; presenting a high-risk of sleep-disordered breathing indicated by a NoSAS score of 8 or higher 32 or a STOP-Bang score of 3 or higher 33,34; resting heart rate (HR) > 100 beats per minute (bpm) or < 50 bpm; resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 or < 90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 or < 50 mmHg; oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 94% at rest on room air. Individuals with abnormal lung function, i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤ 80%, forced vital capacity (FVC) ≤ 80%, and FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%, will also be excluded.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

60 participants in 4 patient groups

IMT
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: IMT
EMT
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: EMT
Sham
Sham Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Sham
Control
No Intervention group

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Central trial contact

William Poncin

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems