ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of SMART VS FIRE Training in Chronic Ankle Instability

S

Sehat Medical Complex

Status

Completed

Conditions

Chronic Ankle Instability

Treatments

Other: SMART TRAINING
Other: FIRE training

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06149052
REC/RCRS/1021 Wajeeha

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study was a randomized clinical trial with the sample size of 26. The study was conducted at Sports Club Sheikhupura. Subjects were enrolled according to eligibility criteria. Patients were divided into two groups, each with 13 patients. Group A received SMART training intervention and warm-up exercises, while group B received Foot intensive rehabilitation exercises (FIRE) and warm up exercises. The session was around 45 to 60 min on each patient with three sessions per week on alternate days. A total of Three weeks treatment regime was given to the patients and assessment of patient's strength (CAIT) and performance (FAAM) was done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after six weeks to observe the long-term effects.

Full description

Ankle sprain is one of the most common sports injuries in physically active individuals and causes a high financial burden on the healthcare system. Seventy-four percent of patients with an acute ankle sprain suffered from residual symptoms lasting 29 months after the initial ankle sprain, such as pain, perceived instability, weakness and swelling. Lateral ankle sprains (LASs) are a common injury sustained by individuals who participate in recreational physical activities and sports. After LAS, a large proportion of individuals develop long-term symptoms, which contribute to the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI).The aim of this study to determine the comparative effects of SMART training intervention versus foot intensive rehabilitation (FIRE) on strength and performance in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

The study was a randomized clinical trial with the sample size of 26. The study was conducted at Sports Club Sheikhupura. Subjects was enrolled according to eligibility criteria. Patients was divided into two groups, each with 13 patients. Group A received SMART training intervention and warm-up exercises, while group B received Foot intensive rehabilitation exercises (FIRE) and warm up exercises. The session was around 45 to 60 min on each patient with three sessions per week on alternate days. A total of Three weeks treatment regime was given to the patients and assessment of patient's strength (CAIT) and performance (FAAM) was done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after six weeks to observe the long-term effects.

Enrollment

25 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Athletes 18-45 years of age,
  • 2 repeated episodes of giving way, feelings of instability
  • Core training not less than 4 week.
  • Chronic ankle instability more than 6 months.
  • Repeated ankle sprain more than twice and patients with <24 points based on CAIT.
  • Athletes with single side ankle instability

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute concomitant injuries of the ankle.
  • Individuals who were able to return to pre-injury levels of activity
  • Serious lower-extremity injuries of the last 6 months
  • Lower-extremity surgery, and neurological diseases
  • Simultaneous severe sprain of both ankle joints

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

25 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A: warm up exercises with SMART training
Active Comparator group
Description:
For sensory stimulation planter massage was given, and it was applied to entire planter surface. Grade III anterior to posterior talocrural joint mobilization was given. For balance, single and double leg stance was performed. For functional training, lateral hops and SEBT was performed. And at the end, for resistance training, theraband was used with normal ankle joint movement. There is a progress in focus between the five domains over the 3weeks, as described below: The domains S and M are present across the whole intervention. In week 1, the main focus is on the A domain, in week 2 on the R domain, and in week 3 on the T domain. During the 3-week intervention period, 3 training sessions was held per week each lasting approximately 45 - 60 min, including 10 min warm up.
Treatment:
Other: SMART TRAINING
Group B: Warm up exercises with foot intensive rehabilitation(FIRE)
Active Comparator group
Description:
The FIRE intervention was included the progressive balance training, ankle and hip strengthening, range of motion exercises and foot massage. Plantar massage consisted of two, 1-min plantar massages with a 1-min rest between sets. Four previously established exercises were target the IFMs including the short-foot, toe-spread-out, hallux extension, and lesser-toe extension.
Treatment:
Other: FIRE training

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems