ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of the SIS Membrane on GBR and Early Loading of Maxillary Anterior Dental Implants

B

Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Implantation
Guided Bone Regeneration

Treatments

Procedure: GBR using an Bio-Gide membrane
Procedure: Delayed implant loading
Procedure: Early implant loading
Procedure: GBR using an SIS membrane

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06574815
CMUSH-IRB-KJ-PJ-2023-24
CSA-SIS2022-17 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to determine whether early implant loading that shortens the healing period to 6 weeks can be safely and effectively applied to implants with good initial stability in the maxillary anterior region, which undergoes simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR), via clinical examination, intraoral scanning, imageological diagnosis, and aesthetic scoring, and to determine the clinical effect of the small intestine submucosa (SIS) biological barrier membrane in such cases involving early loading. This study is expected to provide preliminary guidance on the timing of loading for a single maxillary anterior implant with insufficient bone volume and provide a theoretical basis for the selection of a biological barrier membrane for GBR in such patients.

Full description

Patients were randomized into three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio, including the GBR with a Bio-Gide membrane and delayed implant loading (Gide-DL) group, the GBR with a Bio-Gide membrane and early implant loading (Gide-EL) group, and the GBR with an SIS membrane and early implant loading (SIS-EL) group. The allocation sequence was generated through an online tool (www. random.org) and was concealed in sealed envelopes. At 6 weeks after implant and GBR surgery, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured and recorded at the labial, palatal, mesial, and distal locations via the Osstell device in the Gide-EL group and the SIS-EL group. If the ISQ was ≥ 65, definitive restoration (early loading) was performed (if < 65, the subject was withdrawn from the trial). The digital impressions and occlusal relationships were obtained via intraoral scanning, and the implant-supported crown was designed based on the digital model. Titanium base abutments with angled screw channels (ASCs) and porcelain veneered zirconia (PVZ) crowns were used for restoration. Immediately after definitive restoration, intraoral scanning was used to record the soft tissue contour at the implant site, and CBCT was used to examine the bone tissue around the implant. In addition, patients in the Gide-DL group underwent definitive restoration at 6 months after surgery (delayed loading), and the treatment process was the same as that in the Gide-EL and SIS-EL groups at 6 weeks after surgery. Clinical examination, intraoral scanning, imageological diagnosis, and aesthetic scoring were used to determine the clinical effect of SIS membranes and early implant loading at 1-year follow-up.

Enrollment

36 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with single maxillary anterior tooth loss (sites: 12, 11, 21, 22);
  • age ≥18 years;
  • sex not limited;
  • no history of systemic diseases such as heart disease, hypertension, or diabetes;
  • no periodontal disease or already received periodontal systemic treatment;
  • cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed that the thickness of the alveolar ridge in the tooth loss area was greater than 3 mm but less than 5 mm;
  • using hydrophilic-modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) bone level tapered (BLT) dental implant systems.

Exclusion criteria

  • patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy;
  • patients with a history of hepatitis, tuberculosis, or other infectious diseases;
  • patients with very poor oral hygiene;
  • patients who were heavy smokers;
  • pregnant women.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

36 participants in 3 patient groups

SIS-EL
Experimental group
Description:
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) with an SIS membrane and early implant loading
Treatment:
Procedure: GBR using an SIS membrane
Procedure: Early implant loading
Gide-EL
Active Comparator group
Description:
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a Bio-Gide membrane and early implant loading
Treatment:
Procedure: Early implant loading
Procedure: GBR using an Bio-Gide membrane
Gide-DL
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a Bio-Gide membrane and delayed implant loading
Treatment:
Procedure: Delayed implant loading
Procedure: GBR using an Bio-Gide membrane

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems