Effects of TOA Versus PNF Techniques on Trunk Control in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Riphah International University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Treatments: Device: Group A; Device: Group B

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06232330

REC/RCR&AHS/23/0738

Details and patient eligibility

About

Cerebral palsy occurs in 2-2.5 per 1000 live births, seems to be the most common cause of lifelong physical disability, and has an impact on the child, caregivers, and society. The incidence of cerebral palsy continues to rise owing to the large numbers of premature and high-risk infants who survive. Task-oriented arm approaches promote intensive, meaningful, and goal-oriented training in subjects, and the voluntary functional activities of these subjects possibly reduce their motor disabilities.

Full description

The study will be randomized clinical trial used to evaluate the effectiveness of TOA and PNF on trunk control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Subjects with hemiplegic cerebral palsy meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be divided into two groups using non- probability sampling techniques. Assessment will be done using trunk control measuring scale and pediatric reach test . Group A will receive TOA and conventional therapy and Group B will receive PNF and conventional therapy.

Enrollment: 28 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 6 to 12 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• The level of gross motor function between I and III in accordance with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
• The degree of spasticity in the affected lower extremity between grade 1 and 1+ in accordance with the Modified Ashworth scale
• 6-12 years of age
• Ability to understand and follow verbal instructions

Exclusion criteria

• Surgical procedures within the past 6 months
• Botox injection within 6 months
• Unstable Seizures
• Other comorbidity condition (Multiple Disabilities)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

28 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A

Experimental group

Description:

TOA and conventional therapy

Treatment:

Device: Group A

Group B

Experimental group

Description:

PNF and conventional therapy

Treatment:

Device: Group B