ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effects of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robot and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Stroke

N

National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Stroke

Treatments

Other: Robot and sham tDCS
Other: Robot and tDCS on-line

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04054102
NRC-2018-01-002

Details and patient eligibility

About

Comparison of real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and sham tDCS combined with robot training for upper extremity rehabilitation.

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

19+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Hemiplegic patients secondary to first cerebrovascular accidents
  • Onset ≤ 6 months
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment score ≥ 19
  • Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe upper extremity pain that could interfere with rehabilitation therapy
  • Neurological disorders other than stroke that can cause motor deficits
  • Uncontrolled severe medical conditions.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

Robot and tDCS on-line
Experimental group
Description:
Combined transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) on-line and upper extremity rehabilitation robot
Treatment:
Other: Robot and tDCS on-line
Robot and sham tDCS
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Combined sham tDCS and upper extremity rehabilitation robot
Treatment:
Other: Robot and sham tDCS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Joon-Ho Shin, MS

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems