ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Experimental Bleaching Agents

University of Oklahoma (OU) logo

University of Oklahoma (OU)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity
Tooth Discoloration
Patient Satisfaction

Treatments

Device: BLEACHING GEL A
Device: Whiteness HP Automixx 6%
Device: 5% NF_TiO2
Device: BLEACHING GEL B
Device: Whiteness HP 35%
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06802614
OUCOD001

Details and patient eligibility

About

Tooth bleaching is widely used to treat the colors of teeth. This study compares the efficiency of two experimental bleaching gels, with and without nanoparticles, and with and without light activation versus two commercial bleaching products of low and high concentrations. The objective is to evaluate tooth color change, sensitivity, and patient satisfaction in patients with moderate yellowing of their teeth. Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial that will include 120 participants aged 18-65 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of 12 treatment groups: Gel A (with or without nanoparticles, with or without light), Gel B (with or without nanoparticles, with or without light), Whiteness HP 35% (with or without light) and Whiteness Automixx 6% (with or without light). The primary outcome is tooth color change, measured using a commercially-available equipment. Secondary outcomes will include tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction. Randomization will be computer-generated. Results: The study is expected to show differences in color change between the experimental and commercial gels. Tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction will be evaluated to determine the overall effectiveness and safety of the treatments. Conclusions: This trial will provide information into the whitening efficacy of two experimental gels compared to two widely used commercial products.

Full description

Tooth whitening treatments are widely used to address dental discoloration. This study compares the efficacy of two experimental bleaching gels, Gel A (Carbomer 940 + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide) and Gel B (Hyaluronic Acid + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide), with and without 5% of NF_TiO₂ nanoparticles, and with and without light activation (405 nm, 30 min) versus a control bleaching product (Whiteness HP 35%, FGM). The aim is to evaluate tooth color change, sensitivity, and patient satisfaction in patients with baseline tooth discoloration ranging from shades A3 to C4 on the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial that will include 200 participants aged 18-65 years with mild to moderate tooth discoloration. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of 10 treatment groups: Gel A (with or without nanoparticles, with or without light), Gel B (with or without nanoparticles, with or without light), Whiteness HP 35% (with or without light) and Whiteness Automixx 6% (with or without light). The primary outcome is tooth color change, measured using the Vita EasyShade V system to assess ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WiD). Secondary outcomes will include tooth sensitivity (measured with a Visual Analog Scale) and patient satisfaction (assessed via post-treatment questionnaire). Randomization will be computer-generated, and the study will be double-blinded for evaluators. Results: The study is expected to detect significant differences in color change between the experimental gels and Whiteness HP 35%, with or without nanoparticles and light activation. Tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction will be evaluated to determine the overall effectiveness and safety of the treatments. Conclusions: This trial will provide insights into the whitening efficacy of two experimental gels compared to a widely used commercial product. The inclusion of nanoparticles and light activation as variables will help determine the optimal conditions for effective tooth bleaching in patients with moderate discoloration. The results will contribute to evidence-based recommendations for aesthetic dental treatments.

Enrollment

240 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18-65 years old.
  • Healthy periodontal tissues.
  • Willingness to participate and follow the post-treatment protocols.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Teeth having baseline colors ranging from shade A2 to C4

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Teeth with restorations.
  • History of dentin hypersensitivity.
  • Active caries, periodontal disease or endodontically treated teeth.
  • Use of substances that could affect tooth color during the trial, such as smoking and vaping.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

240 participants in 12 patient groups

1. Gel A with nanoparticles, no light.
Experimental group
Description:
An experimental Bleaching Gel composed of Carbomer 940 hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 5% nanoparticles (NF_TiO₂) will be applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: 5% NF_TiO2
Device: BLEACHING GEL A
2. Gel A with nanoparticles, with light.
Experimental group
Description:
An experimental Bleaching Gel composed of Carbomer 940 hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 5% nanoparticles (NF_TiO₂) + 405 nm violet LED light will be applied for 50 minutes after the gel is applied.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: 5% NF_TiO2
Device: BLEACHING GEL A
3. Gel A without nanoparticles, no light.
Experimental group
Description:
An experimental Bleaching Gel composed of Carbomer 940 hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide will be applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: BLEACHING GEL A
4. Gel A without nanoparticles, with light.
Experimental group
Description:
An experimental Bleaching Gel composed of Carbomer 940 hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 405 nm violet LED light applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: BLEACHING GEL A
5. Gel B with nanoparticles, no light.
Experimental group
Description:
Hyaluronic Acid hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 5% nanoparticles (NF_TiO₂) applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: BLEACHING GEL B
Device: 5% NF_TiO2
6. Gel B with nanoparticles, with light.
Experimental group
Description:
Hyaluronic Acid hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 5% nanoparticles (NF_TiO₂) + 405 nm violet LED light applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: BLEACHING GEL B
Device: 5% NF_TiO2
7. Gel B without nanoparticles, no light.
Experimental group
Description:
Hyaluronic Acid hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: BLEACHING GEL B
8. Gel B without nanoparticles, with light.
Experimental group
Description:
Hyaluronic Acid hydrogel + 6% Hydrogen Peroxide + 405 nm violet LED light applied for 50 minutes.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: BLEACHING GEL B
9. Whiteness HP 35% no light (control).
Active Comparator group
Description:
Whiteness HP 35% applied for 30 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: Whiteness HP 35%
10. Whiteness HP 35% with light (control).
Active Comparator group
Description:
Whiteness HP 35% + 405 nm violet LED light applied for 30 minutes.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: Whiteness HP 35%
11. Whiteness HP AutoMixx 6% no light (control)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Whiteness HP AutoMixx 6% applied for 30 minutes.
Treatment:
Device: Whiteness HP Automixx 6%
12. Whiteness HP AutoMixx 6% with light (control)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Whiteness HP 6% + 405 nm violet LED light applied for 30 minutes.
Treatment:
Radiation: VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION
Device: Whiteness HP Automixx 6%

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Fernando L Esteban Florez, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems