Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Title: Efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag VS Avatrombopag combined with rhTPO in patients with severe aplastic anemia: a single-center, controlled study Observation group: Patients with severe aplastic anemia who did not respond to initial treatment (unconditional HSCT or ATG) or other treatments (except HSCT) Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag and rhTPO in the treatment of patients with severe aplastic anemia, to provide more treatment options for patients with severe aplastic anemia who are unable to undergo transplantation /ATG or have failed previous treatment, and to provide evidence-based evidence for the use of Avatrombopag or combined with rhTPO to promote hematopoietic recovery Experimental design: Single center, controlled study Total number of cases: 30 cases/group, 2 groups
Case selection criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
One of the following circumstances is not eligible for inclusion:
Exit criteria:
Test termination:
A: The Avatrombopag group was given Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally, for 3 months.
B: Avatrombopag +rhTPO group, Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally; rhTPO: 15000U/ time, once a day, subcutaneous injection; Both were 3 months.
Efficacy index:
Main therapeutic indicators:
Overall response rate at 3 months (OR);
Secondary efficacy measures:
Complete response rate at 3 months (CR); The time of the first occurrence of PR and CR within 3 months of medication; The proportion of subjects who were off platelet transfusion at 3 months; Hemorrhage score records of patients within 3 months of medication; Health-related quality of life score (SF-36 scale).
Efficacy criteria:
Complete response (CR) : HGB > 100 g/L; ANC > 1.5 × 109 /L; PLT > 100×109/L; Partial response (PR) : disengagement from component blood transfusion and no longer meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAA; Invalid (NR) : SAA diagnostic criteria are still met.
Full description
Title: Efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag VS Avatrombopag combined with rhTPO in patients with severe aplastic anemia: a single-center, controlled study Version number: V3.0 Observation group: Patients with severe aplastic anemia who did not respond to initial treatment (unconditional HSCT or ATG) or other treatments (except HSCT) Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avatrombopag and rhTPO in the treatment of patients with severe aplastic anemia, to provide more treatment options for patients with severe aplastic anemia who are unable to undergo transplantation /ATG or have failed previous treatment, and to provide evidence-based evidence for the use of Avatrombopag or combined with rhTPO to promote hematopoietic recovery Experimental design: Single center, controlled study Total number of cases: 30 cases/group, 2 groups
Case selection criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
One of the following circumstances is not eligible for inclusion:
Exit criteria:
Test termination:
A: The Avatrombopag group was given Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally, for 3 months.
B: Avatrombopag +rhTPO group, Avatrombopag: 40 mg/ time, once a day, orally; rhTPO: 15000U/ time, once a day, subcutaneous injection; Both were 3 months.
Dose adjustment:
A: In the Avatrombopag group, if PLT≥200×109 /L lasted for 2 weeks or ≥100×109 /L lasted for 1 month, the dosage of Avatrombopag was reduced to 20 mg/d; If PLT remained ≥200×109 /L for 2 weeks or ≥100×109 /L for 1 month, the dosage of Avatrombopag was reduced to 20 mg once every other day. If the PLT is still ≥200×109/L for 2 weeks or ≥100×109 /L for 1 month, the drug should be stopped. If PLT rose rapidly and was ≥400×109 /L, the drug should be stopped and observed until PLT < 100×109 /L, and then continued with 20 mg/d.
B: Avatrombopag group +rhTPO: dosage adjustment of Avatrombopag as above; If PLT rises to ≥100×109/L for 2 weeks, rhTPO will be reduced to 15000u every other day. If PLT is still ≥100×109/L for 2 weeks, rhTPO will be reduced to 15000u every 3 days. If the PLT is still ≥100×109/L for 2 weeks, stop.
Efficacy index:
Main therapeutic indicators:
Overall response rate at 3 months (OR);
Secondary efficacy measures:
Complete response rate at 3 months (CR); The time of the first occurrence of PR and CR within 3 months of medication; The proportion of subjects who were off platelet transfusion at 3 months; Hemorrhage score records of patients within 3 months of medication; Health-related quality of life score (SF-36 scale).
Efficacy criteria:
Complete response (CR) : HGB > 100 g/L; ANC > 1.5 × 109 /L; PLT > 100×109/L; Partial response (PR) : disengagement from component blood transfusion and no longer meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAA; Invalid (NR) : SAA diagnostic criteria are still met.
Safety indicators:
Study process: Screening period (-7-0 days)
Obtain informed consent;
Collect demographic information and basic data of subjects;
Record the medical history and current treatment, and combine drugs;
Vital signs, physical examination;
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function);
Bone marrow puncture and biopsy;
Pregnancy test (for women of childbearing age);
Review the entry criteria. Visit 1 (+1 day) After baseline screening, patients meeting the inclusion criteria were given medication at baseline according to group A and Group B, respectively.
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function); 2. Vital signs and physical examination; 3. Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion; 4. Bleeding score was recorded; 5. Health-related quality of life score; 6. Record adverse events after medication. Visit 2 (+2 weeks)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function);
Vital signs and physical examination;
Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion;
Bleeding score was recorded;
Health-related quality of life score;
Record adverse events after medication. Visit 3 (+4 weeks)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function); 2. Vital signs and physical examination; 3. Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion; 4. Bleeding score was recorded; 5. Health-related quality of life score; 6. Record adverse events after medication. Visit 4 (+6 weeks)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function);
Vital signs and physical examination;
Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion;
Bleeding score was recorded;
Health-related quality of life score;
Record adverse events after medication. Visit 5 (+8 weeks)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function); 2. Vital signs and physical examination; 3. Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion; 4. Bleeding score was recorded; 5. Health-related quality of life score; 6. Record adverse events after medication. Visit 6 (+10 weeks)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function);
Vital signs and physical examination;
Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion;
Bleeding score was recorded;
Health-related quality of life score;
Record adverse events after medication. Visit 7 (+12 weeks /3 months)
Blood test: blood routine and blood biochemistry (including liver and kidney function); 2. Vital signs and physical examination; 3. Record drug combinations, including blood transfusion; 4. Bleeding score was recorded; 5. Health-related quality of life score; 6. Record adverse events after medication; 7. Pregnancy test (for women of childbearing age); 8. Genetic examination to analyze chromosome mutations; 9. Bone marrow puncture and biopsy. Long-term follow-up is recommended for patients with conditions. Adverse events were closely observed during the study, and the combination of drugs was recorded in detail.
Drug combination:
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analysis method:
SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The measurement data were described statistically by means of ± standard deviation. The changes before and after treatment were compared with the baseline values using paired T-test. Changes before and after treatment were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Counting data were statistically described by frequency (component ratio). All statistical tests were carried out using bilateral tests, and the statistical quantity and exact probability P-value were given. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
One of the following circumstances is not eligible for inclusion:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal