Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sarecycline versus placebo in the treatment of microcirculation dysfunction after reperfusion therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke.
Full description
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 7-day Sarecycline versus placebo in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke who received reperfusion therapy within 24 hours of onset. In addition, we will explore the effect of Sarecycline versus placebo on indicators of venous thrombotic inflammation at different time points in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.
This trial was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke who received reperfusion therapy within 24 hours of onset were randomly assigned according to the ratio of the experimental group: control group =2:1.
The trial was divided into three phases: screening/baseline period, treatment period, and follow-up period. The primary research objective is to evaluate the effect of Sarecycline in improving neurological deficits at 7 days in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke who received reperfusion therapy within 24 hours of onset.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
120 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Yilong Wang, PhD,MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal