Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This is a phase III study for evaluation of Nasotestt efficacy compared to Androgel in the treatment of male participants with hypogonadism condition (reduced levels of testosterone) that have clinical indication of hormonal replacement with testosterone.
Full description
This efficacy and safety study will evaluate the superiority of Nasotestt (nasal gel) treatment compared to Androgel (topic gel) after 60 days of starting use. The efficacy endpoint will be verified through the percentage of participants which presented at the end of 60 days normalized levels of total testosterone (<300 ng/dL to >1050 ng/dL). Secondary efficacy endpoints will be collected throughout the study through: evaluation of symptoms of erectile dysfunction (The International Index of Erectile Function - IIEF), symptoms of prostatic disease (International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS), measurement of abdominal perimeter and clinical global response to treatment (CGI-I questionnaire). As exploratory investigation, the satisfaction/comfort of Nasotestt use will be assessed by a specific questionnaire that will be applied to participants at the end of study. Safety evaluation data will include report of all adverse events, including type, frequency, intensity, seriousness, severity and action taken related to the investigational product of the study.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
228 participants in 4 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Luciana Ferrara, CRO; Maxuel Monteiro, Regulatory
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal