ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of Additional Titration During Oral Appliance Treatment for Sleep-disordered Breathing.

A

Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Treatments

Device: Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01666886
EC 12/30/243

Details and patient eligibility

About

In the protocol "Predicting therapeutic outcome of mandibular advancement device treatment in obstructive sleep apnea (PROMAD)", 100 patients with obstructive sleep apnea are included and started MAD treatment at 75% of maximal protrusion. All patients underwent polysomnography with MAD in situ to evaluate the effect of the MAD on severity of sleep apnea. If the results of the polysomnography with MAD are unsuccessful (defined as a reduction in AHI with the MAD in situ of less than 50% compared to baseline), the therapy needs to be adjusted. Finding the most effective protrusion should be a weighted compromise between efficacy and side-effects of MAD therapy.

In patients with insufficient results on the polysomnography with the MAD at 75% of maximal protrusion, the MAD will be further adjusted until 90% of the maximal protrusion measured at the follow-up visit after the polysomnography with the MAD. After habituation and adaptation period but within 2 months after the first polysomnography with MAD, a new polysomnography will be performed to assess the effect of the 90% protruded position.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m²
  • OSAS, as defined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force
  • apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 50
  • incomplete elimination of apneas and/or hypopnea during therapy with mandibular advancement device in 75% of maximal protrusion

Exclusion criteria

  • Other sleep disorders (i.e. parasomnias)
  • Invasive upper airway surgery for sleep-disordered breathing
  • Known genetic disorders with craniofacial and/or upper airway malformations
  • Use of benzodiazepine and/or antidepressants
  • Known history of psychiatric disease
  • Known history of fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome
  • Dental contra-indications: functional restrictions of the temporomandibular joint, insufficient dentition with pathological changes, insufficient retention for MAD use

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 1 patient group

Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD)
Experimental group
Description:
Mandibular advancement during therapy with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) in 90% of maximal protrusion
Treatment:
Device: Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems