ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of Assistive Soft Gloves in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation

K

Kocaeli University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Stroke

Treatments

Other: Occupational therapy
Device: Sybero SRGs

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07327151
KAEK/16.bI.05

Details and patient eligibility

About

Stroke is a leading cause of disability, with hemiparesis affecting approximately 85% of survivors, particularly affecting the upper limbs, which play a critical role in the activities of daily living (ADLs). While robot-assisted rehabilitation (RAR) is gaining increasing attention owing to its capacity for intensive, repetitive, and task-specific training that promotes neuroplasticity, robot-assisted hand rehabilitation (RAHR) is not yet part of standard protocols and is understudied. This study investigated the effects of a soft rehabilitation glove (SRG) applied in addition to traditional neurorehabilitation on upper limb motor function and ADLs in individuals with chronic stroke.

Full description

This study aimed to investigate the effect of SRG, used in the treatment of stroke patients, on upper limb motor functions and ADLs. Stroke, the second most common cause of death in the community after heart disease, constitutes a significant health problem leading to disability in survivors. Hemiparesis, affecting approximately 85% of post-stroke patients, specifically targets the upper limbs. This rate was observed to be 40% in patients with chronic stroke. The majority of neurological motor recovery tends to occur within the first three months and can continue for up to six months, with functional improvement being prominent in the initial six months and potentially extending for up to one year. Problems arising after stroke include muscle weakness, loss of motor control, sensory disturbances, balance impairments, contractures, and changes in muscle tone. The fundamental goal of stroke rehabilitation is to enable stroke patients to achieve the maximum possible physical, functional, and psychosocial recovery within their limitations. Due to the more complex and delicately controlled anatomical structure of the upper limbs, post-stroke prognosis significantly influences ADLs. Therefore, upper limb rehabilitation is crucial for promoting independence in ADLs and improving quality of life (QoL). The number of studies on RAR has increased rapidly over the past decade. RAR contribute to the development of neuroplasticity in the brain owing to their high intensity, repetitiveness, task specificity, interactivity, and ability to objectively evaluate patient performance. The improvements correlated with motor abilities due to this development are crucial for enhancing functional performance. According to the literature, RAHR treatments applied to stroke patients significantly contribute to the improvement of upper-limb motor functions, strength, and motor control parameters after treatment. However, RAHR therapy has not yet been included in standard diagnosis/treatment protocols for hemiplegic individuals. As it is a relatively new concept introduced in the rehabilitation environment, its use is still being explored. Current research suggests the need for further studies to determine the effects of RAHR therapy on various components of stroke rehabilitation to provide higher-quality evidence. RAR treatments have been shown to stimulate neuroplastic changes through mirror neurons and consequently facilitate widespread cortical activation, which is essential for functional recovery after a stroke. Therefore, RAHR in stroke patients can contribute to functional improvement by enabling the application of goal-oriented tasks in enriched environments and ensuring high repetitions and intensity. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SRG therapy, applied in addition to routine neurological rehabilitation programs, on the affected upper limb motor functions and ADLs in hemiplegic volunteers.

Enrollment

34 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Individuals aged 18 and above who have experienced cerebrovascular events confirmed by neuroimaging and are planned to be enrolled in a neurological rehabilitation treatment program.
  2. Those whose event date was more than 3 (three) months.
  3. Individuals with upper limb and hand assessment of 3 or above according to the Brunnstrom Motor Assessment Scale.
  4. Those with spasticity level of 2 and below in upper limb muscle groups according the Modified Ashworth Scale.
  5. Individuals scoring 24 and above on the Standardized Mini-Mental Test.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Individuals with severe dystonia.
  2. Those with severe soft tissue and/or joint contractures in the upper limbs.
  3. Individuals with active reflex sympathetic dystrophy, active arthritis, fractures, circulatory disorders, or bone malignancies in the affected upper limbs.
  4. Those with peripheral nerve injuries in the affected upper limb.
  5. Individuals with cognitive or behavioral disorders that would hinder participation in the treatment program.
  6. Those with aphasia and apraxia at a level that would hinder participation in the treatment program.
  7. Individuals allergic to N Cloth and Lycra.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

34 participants in 2 patient groups

Soft Rehabilitation Glove (SRG) Group
Experimental group
Description:
Volunteers in the research group, in addition to routine neurological rehabilitation programs, will receive rehabilitation using SRGs five days a week, totaling 15 sessions, with each session lasting 20 min.
Treatment:
Device: Sybero SRGs
Control Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Volunteers in the control group will receive standard diagnosis/treatment protocols, including occupational therapy activities, within the same period.
Treatment:
Other: Occupational therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems