ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of Bilateral Modified Catheter Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery

C

China Medical University

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Treatments

Procedure: Conventional Brain Perfusion
Procedure: Modified Catheter Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion (Modified bACP)

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06943716
CMUH113-REC1-183 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a Bilateral Modified Catheter Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion (Modified bACP) technique in acute Type A aortic dissection surgery. Medical records from January 1, 2021, through October 31, 2024, at China Medical University Hospital will be reviewed. The primary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and stroke rate, while secondary outcomes include ICU/hospital stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and other postoperative complications (e.g., acute kidney injury, sepsis, myocardial infarction).

Full description

Background and Rationale Acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical repair. Prolonged circulatory arrest increases the risk of neurological complications. Bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) has shown potential to reduce ischemic injury. However, conventional bACP requires additional surgical access. This study examines a Modified bACP approach that may reduce surgical trauma while maintaining adequate cerebral perfusion.

Objectives This retrospective cohort study evaluates whether Modified bACP improves postoperative outcomes compared to conventional perfusion strategies in ATAAD surgery at China Medical University Hospital (2021/1/1-2024/10/31).

Methods We will collect and analyze medical records of adult patients who underwent ATAAD repair, comparing those who received Modified bACP to those managed with conventional perfusion.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes:

In-hospital mortality 30-day mortality

Secondary Outcomes:

Hospital length of stay (day) ICU length of stay (day) Mechanical ventilation duration (hours) Need for tracheostomy Stroke Postoperative neurological deficit Paraplegia Coma Atrial fibrillation (Af) Myocardial infarction Acute kidney injury (AKI) Dialysis requirement Reoperation for bleeding Sepsis Significance This study aims to provide comprehensive data on the safety and efficacy of Modified bACP in ATAAD surgery, potentially improving neurological protection and reducing other major complications and resource utilization. The findings may guide clinical practice and inform future protocol developments.

Enrollment

273 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥ 18 years old) who underwent acute Type A aortic dissection repair at China Medical University Hospital between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2024.

Exclusion criteria

  • Preexisting severe neurological impairment (e.g., stroke or other major neurological deficits before surgery).
  • Age < 18 years.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Insufficient or missing medical records preventing data analysis.

Trial design

273 participants in 2 patient groups

Modified bACP Group
Description:
Patients who underwent acute Type A aortic dissection repair using the Bilateral Modified Catheter Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion (Modified bACP) technique. This observational group received the modified perfusion strategy aimed at reducing surgical trauma and enhancing cerebral protection.
Treatment:
Procedure: Modified Catheter Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion (Modified bACP)
Conventional Perfusion Group
Description:
Patients who underwent acute Type A aortic dissection repair using the conventional brain perfusion technique (e.g., standard bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion). This group serves as the comparison cohort for evaluating the effects of the modified technique.
Treatment:
Procedure: Conventional Brain Perfusion

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems