Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Through a scientific and standardized multicenter, blinding, double-dummy, randomized controlled, noninferiority clinical trial study method, the investigators evaluated electroacupuncture as a safe and effective non-pharmacological treatment for OAB in women by comparison with Solifenacin Succinate.
Full description
Epidemiological researches have shown that approximately 500 million people worldwide are affected by OAB, 2 3 with a higher incidence in women than that in men. Pharmacological treatment remains the usual method of clinical treatment. However, some Pharmacologphy has certain side effects, such as blurred consciousness, dry mouth, constipation, and so on, which have limited its widespread clinical use. Therefore, the treatment of OAB needs comprehensive consideration in clinical practice, which deserves our attention and active exploration of other effective treatment methods to relieve patients' pain.Electroacupuncture can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of OAB. As for the comparison between electroacupuncture and medication for the treatment of OAB in women, the results are inconclusive based on the limited research evidence. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture compared to Solifenacin Succinate.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
204 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
PING YIN; YUELAI CHEN
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal