ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

"Efficacy of Hybrid Systems ("Topping Off") Versus Rigid Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Dual-center, Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study ("CD Horizon BalanC")"

U

University of Cologne

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Spine Surgery

Treatments

Device: Solera™ Medtronic
Device: CD HORIZON BalanC™ Medtronic

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT02551302
Ortho-6-2015

Details and patient eligibility

About

Effectiveness of hybrid systems ("topping off") compared to rigid spondylodesis in fusion surgery of the lumbar spine: A prospective, randomized, bicentric pilot study ("CD HORIZON BalanC™)

Full description

Posterior spondylodesis and monosegmental intervertebral cage plus flexible spondylodesis of the superiorly adjacent segment (CD HORIZON BalanC™ Manufacturer: Medtronic)

Control:

Posterior spondylodesis and monosegmental intervertebral cage

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent
  • Legal capacity
  • Age ≥ 30 years
  • Indication for monosegmental lumbar spine fusion (PLIF or "topping-off ") L2-S1 with osteochondrosis Modic grades I-III [20][21][22] or spondylolisthesis Meyerding grades I-III.
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion without signs of instability

Exclusion criteria

  • Motor deficit
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Previous surgical intervention of the lumbar spine
  • Relevant peripheral neuropathy
  • Acute denervation subsequent to a radiculopathy
  • Scoliosis with Cobb angle greater than 25°
  • Spondylolisthesis > Meyerding grade III
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion with signs of instability (for definition, see inclusion criteria)
  • No radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion (for definition, see inclusion criteria)
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion with >Fujiwara grade II [15] or >Pfirrmann grade IV [14]
  • Signs of instability in any lumbar spine segment other than that undergoing fusion
  • General contraindication for elective lumbar spine surgery
  • Pathologic fracture
  • Osteoporosis with pathologic fracture
  • Active systemic infection
  • Rheumatic disease
  • Disease of bone metabolism (e.g. Paget's Disease)
  • Bone metastasis
  • Local infection focus lumbar spine
  • Seizure disorder
  • Chronic ischemia Fontaine classification IIb-IV
  • Severe heart insufficiency (NYHA III-IV)
  • Blood coagulation disorder or blood thinning therapy
  • Cortisone intake more than one month in the last 12 months before randomization
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial in the 30 days before randomization
  • Known allergy or intolerance to the implants
  • Dependency on investigator
  • Lack of familiarity with the German language
  • Placement in an institution by governmental or juridical advice
  • Absent legal capacity
  • Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

60 participants in 2 patient groups

PLIF
Other group
Description:
The control group will receive a monosegmental posterior lumbar spine fusion with an intervertebral cage (PLIF).
Treatment:
Device: Solera™ Medtronic
Hybrid system (PLIF + flexible pedicle screw system above the
Other group
Description:
The intervention group will receive a hybrid system with a PLIF and a flexible pedicle screw system above the fusion.
Treatment:
Device: CD HORIZON BalanC™ Medtronic

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Jan Siewe, Dr.med.; Margarete Wicharz

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems