ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) Block Compared to Ultrasound-guided TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.

Yale University logo

Yale University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 2

Conditions

the Efficacy of Analgesia of Laparoscopic TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgeries

Treatments

Drug: TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04345341
No NIH funding (Other Identifier)
2000026422

Details and patient eligibility

About

We propose a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane (LA-TAP) performed intraoperatively compared with usual postoperative analgesia without LA-TAP block. We hypothesise that there will be a decrease in postoperative opioid utilization and in pain scores for patients randomized to receive the LA-TAP block verses those who do not. We expect that patients will opt to take less break through opioid medication in the LA-TAP block group versus the no TAP block group.

Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes:

Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction?

Full description

Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes:

Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction?

Patients will be randomized in two arms , LA-TAP , NO-TAP block . Each patient would fill out the pain score sheet and number of narcotic medications she used in first 24h, 48h and 72 h post operatively .

Enrollment

80 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years old and above
  • English speaking
  • patients with capacity to consent
  • Elective laparoscopic and robotic benign genecology cases
  • Elective laparoscopy/ robotic hysterectomy
  • Elective laparoscopy/robotic myomectomy
  • ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol applied

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women
  • patients with positive urine pregnancy test in pre operative
  • emergency procedures
  • Procedure requiring staging or debulking
  • surgeries that convert to laparotomy
  • patients with allergy to local/systemic anaesthesia or analgesia
  • Inability to undergo normal anesthesia induction process
  • ASA III or higher
  • history of pain relief medication dependence
  • history of substance abuse
  • end stage chronic kidney disease
  • advanced liver disease
  • history of chronic pain
  • history of taking opioids or neuropathic agents regularly prior to surgery
  • BMI of 50 or over
  • skin infections at the site of TAP block injection or port sites.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

80 participants in 2 patient groups

Laparoscopic assisted TAP block
Active Comparator group
Description:
Laparoscopic assisted TAP block will be done by surgeon intra-operatively
Treatment:
Drug: TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine
no TAP block
No Intervention group
Description:
no TAP block would be done

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Farinaz Seifi, MD, FACOG

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems