ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Chang Gung Medical Foundation logo

Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Treatments

Device: VRCIT
Device: SES
Device: traditional rehabilitation program
Device: VCT

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02039284
101-5261A3

Details and patient eligibility

About

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common childhood motor disability. Weakness, spasticity, and loss of dexterity are the major problems in patients with CP. A novel virtual cycling training (VCT) program for lower limb was to enhance promising muscle strength through promoting the participant compliance and motivation. Sensory electrical stimulation(SES) of whole hand is a novel technique and is commonly used to treatment of spasticity for patients with stroke. Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is a method for treating developmental disregard and learned non-use of affected limb and improving motor efficiency, functional performance, and activities of daily living for patients with CP.

Full description

This study will proposed 3 novel protocols, including upper extremity (UE) VCT, UE SES, and virtual reality based CIT (VRCIT) in the treatment of upper limb dysfunction in patients with CP. investigators hypothesize that the functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will improve through biomechanical and physiological changes after different treatment protocols in patients with CP. The biomechanical and physiological changes varied depending on different treatment protocols. This project aims to: 1. the immediate effects of new protocols in these patients through biomechanical, physiological, and clinical measures; 2. the maintaining effects of new protocols in these patients through biomechanical, physiological, and clinical measures;3. the most effective treatment protocol; 3. the biomechanical and physiological mechanism underlying clinical improvement; and 5. the clinical predictors influencing the outcome for new protocols.

This 4-year project will recruit an estimated 92-100 patients with CP. A blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was designed. In the phase I (1st year), investigators will set-up the experimental protocols and perform pilot study. Twenty patients will be randomized into 4 groups: SES, VCT, VRCIT, and shame control groups. In the phase II (2nd -3rd year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups: SES and shame control groups. In the phase III (3rd -4th year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups:VCT and VRCIT groups. The outcome measures include biomechanical, physiological (muscle tone, muscle strength and endurance, kinematics, bone density, body compositions, metabolism), and clinical assessments, including functioning (motor impairment, movement and participation) and HRQOL, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The outcome measures will be administered at before, immediately after 12-week intervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments.

This project is significant for the translational and evidence-based medicine on CP neurorehabilitation. The research will offer valuable biomechanical and physiological biomarker that support motor control models proposed to account for motor problems and new protocol intervention in these patients.

Enrollment

61 patients

Sex

All

Ages

3 to 20 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. diagnosis with spastic CP with Gross Motor Function Classification System(GMFCS) levels I-IV
  2. aged 3-20 years
  3. ability to undergo clinical assessment
  4. ability to comprehend commands and cooperate during an examination

Exclusion criteria

  1. chromosomal abnormalities
  2. progressive neurological disorder or severe concurrent illness or disease not typically associated with CP
  3. active medical conditions such as pneumonia or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
  4. any major surgery or nerve block in the preceding 3 months
  5. metabolic or hormonal disturbance
  6. cardiovascular disorder
  7. poor tolerance or a poor cooperation during assessment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

61 participants in 4 patient groups

SES group
Experimental group
Description:
SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.
Treatment:
Device: SES
VCT group
Experimental group
Description:
VCT group received the VCT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise.
Treatment:
Device: VCT
VRCIT group
Experimental group
Description:
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day.
Treatment:
Device: VRCIT
traditional rehabilitation group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Shame control group received the shame SES and traditional rehabilitation programs.
Treatment:
Device: traditional rehabilitation program

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems