Efficacy of NSAID Peritendinous Injection for Acute Tendinitis

Taipei Medical University

Status: Active, not recruiting

Conditions: NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug); Tendinitis; Acute Tendonitis

Treatments: Drug: Control group (placebo); Drug: Peritendinous NSAID injection

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06834425

114-wf-eva-19 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

N202412008

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study evaluates whether NSAID peritendinous or ligament injections at acute sprain sites can relieve pain and restore function.

Forty patients will be randomly assigned to either the injection or oral NSAID group. Pain will be assessed subjectively using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and objectively through pressure pain threshold measurements. Functional outcomes (DASH for the upper limb, FADI for the lower limb) will be evaluated before treatment and at 3 days, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-treatment.

Full description

Acute tendon inflammation is a common sports injury, typically treated with oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or local corticosteroid injections at the affected site. Direct corticosteroid injections provide the fastest relief; however, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has restricted the use of corticosteroids by any route in its latest banned substance list. As a result, corticosteroid injections into tendons or joints, which were previously allowed during competitions, can no longer be used. Currently, the only methods available for acute inflammation relief during competitions are oral NSAIDs and ice therapy. For athletes without structural damage who need to quickly reduce inflammation and return to play, these methods may be insufficient.

Previous clinical studies on NSAID injections into tendons and joints have shown that local NSAID injections are equally effective as corticosteroid injections for treating shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis. However, these studies mainly focused on patients with chronic arthritis and tendinitis. The difference in efficacy between oral NSAIDs and tendon injections during the acute phase of inflammation remains unknown. This study aims to compare different routes of NSAID administration to identify the most appropriate treatment for managing acute tendinitis in high-level athletes.

We hypothesize that peritendinous NSAID injections will provide greater pain relief and functional improvement.

Enrollment: 40 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 20 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Ultrasonography diagnosed acute tendinitis with inflammation
• 20-70 years old

Exclusion criteria

• Cognitive impairment.
• Post operation at painful site.
• Neuropathic pain or vascularity disease
• Unable to receive injection therapy, including a history of syncope during injection.
• Allergy history to NSAID
• Within 14 days after coronary artery bypass graft, CABG

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

40 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Intervention group

Experimental group

Description:

Local anesthetics and NSAID(parecoxib) peritendinous Injection for acute tendinitis

Treatment:

Drug: Peritendinous NSAID injection

Control group

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

Local anesthetics and normal saline peritendinous injection for acute tendinitis

Treatment:

Drug: Control group (placebo)