Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Professional oral hygiene has become a customary procedure in everyday dentistry. Both manual and sonic brushes are part of normal oral hygiene education practice. Compared with manual toothbrushes, ergonomic instruments, such as sonic toothbrushes, can be a more practical and less demanding mean to remove biofilm and plaque efficiently. Studies in literature investigate the efficacy of toothbrushes in plaque removal, but the investiagator's study would validate efficacy of toothbrushes post-causal therapy, towards lower plaque accumulation, and reduction in bleeding.
The objective of this study is to compare two methods (manual VS sonic) of tooth brushing in terms of impact on the gingival index and plaque index after one session of Full Mouth-Erythritol Powder Air Polishing Therapy (FM-EPAPT) in healthy patients.
The hypothesis of the present randomized controlled trial is that sonic tooth brushing accumulates less plaque (-10%) than manual tooth brushing.
To test this hypothesis, the patients, upon initial evaluation, will be divided in 2 study groups and, after a session of professional oral hygiene, will be instructed to use:
Full description
Everyone's goal to have a healthy mouth is the removal of biofilm, plaque and calculus from the dental surface everyday. Moreover routine recalls ensure a better oral health and greater protection against caries, gingivitis and periodontitis. Regular attendance to oral hygiene sessions plays an important role but has to be accompanied by the compliance with home oral care instructions. The patients should be adequately instructed to take care of their oral health.
TRIAL DESIGN: Monocetric, pragmatic, single blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of parallel design.The trial will have one-year duration.
STUDY POPULATION: Healthy subject affected by gingivitis are included in the study. Presence of gingivitis is defined as bleeding on probing (BOP) > 25%.
PRIMARY OUTCOME: Change in Plaque Index (PI): change in 10% less of the site in test group.
SECONDARY OUTCOME:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
32 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal