ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of the Standard Treatment and Fusion Ontogenetic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers (FUSIONIV)

Seoul National University logo

Seoul National University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Uterine Cancer
Cervical Cancer

Treatments

Procedure: Uterine cancer
Procedure: Cervical cancer
Procedure: Non-cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion
Procedure: Cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02986568
2015-1616

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare standard treatment and fusion ontogenetic surgery (total mesometrial resection, laterally extended endopelvic resection, peritoneal mesometrial resection) for gynecologic cancer in order to evaluate treatment response, adverse effect and survival.

Full description

Fujii method and ontogenetic surgery are the surgical method of radical hysterectomy that can preserve pelvic organ function as much as possible.

Fujii method has advantage of preserving pelvic autonomic nerve with radical resection of tissue under parametrium. And ontogenetic surgery has advantage of reducing need of radiation therapy by radical resection of tissue above parametrium.

This study is prospective study for fusion ontogenetic surgery that has the advantage of both Fujji method and ontogenetic surgery.

Enrollment

380 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

20+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, Age ≥ 20 years
  • Patients with primary, recurrent, or refractory cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB1-IVA), primary, recurrent, or refractory uterine cancer (FIGO stage IA, grade 3, IB-IVA), or gynecologic cancer patients showing pelvic sidewall recurrence.
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • Extensive surgery might be expected to cure the disease, or expected to relieve severe pelvic pain.
  • Patients who signed an approved informed consent
  • Patients who do not have a treatment option other than surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Female, Age < 20 years
  • ECOG performance status ≥2
  • Bilateral pelvic sidewall invasion
  • Patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy, trachelectomy, or hysterectomy in case of the primary disease.
  • Patients who refused to sign an informed consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

380 participants in 4 patient groups

Cervical cancer
Experimental group
Description:
* Primary cervical cancer patients, FIGO stage IB1-IIB * Refractory cervical cancer patients who do not respond to concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy * Recurrent cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy
Treatment:
Procedure: Cervical cancer
Uterine cancer
Experimental group
Description:
* Primary uterine cancer patients, FIGO stage IA, grade3, IB-IVA * Refractory uterine cancer who does not respond to concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy * Recurrent uterine cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy
Treatment:
Procedure: Uterine cancer
Cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion
Experimental group
Description:
Cervical cancer patients showing pelvic sidewall invasion * Primary cervical cancer * Refractory cervical cancer patients who do not respond to concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy * Recurrent cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy
Treatment:
Procedure: Cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion
Non-cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion
Experimental group
Description:
* Gynecologic cancer patients other than cerivcal cancer, showing pelvic sidewall invasion with or without distant metastasis * Patients showing uncontrolled pelvic pain due to the tumor invasion
Treatment:
Procedure: Non-cervical cancer, pelvic sidewall invasion

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Hee Seung Kim, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems