ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficacy of Topical Calcipotriol-assisted AFL-PDT in Actinic Keratosis

D

Dong-A University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 1

Conditions

Actinic Dermatosis

Treatments

Drug: Topical Vitamin D (Calcipotriol) application
Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application
Drug: MAL application
Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment
Drug: Placebo cream application
Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02976727
DAUderma-07

Details and patient eligibility

About

Vitamin D(Vit D) is a pro-differentiation agent that enhances the accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) after MAL(methyl-aminolevulinate) incubation in actinic keratosis and may have significant benefit for the treatment of actinic keratosis by ablative fractional laser-primed photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT).

Full description

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL) is effective in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Many strategies have been studied to improve the production of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), to improve efficacy of PDT. Pre-treatment of the skin with fractional laser resurfacing is a novel alternative technique to improve the efficacy of PDT for AK. The investigators' previous studies showed that ablative fractional laser primed PDT (AFL-PDT) offered higher efficacy than conventional MAL-PDT in the treatment of AK. But, reduced response rates are also observed in thicker skin lesions, which may be due to insufficient PpIX accumulation within the target tissue.

Cellular differentiation leads to increased synthesis of PpIX from MAL and consecutively, differentiation therapy enhances photosensitization effect. Topical calcipotriol is a well-known pro-differentiation hormone and was demonstrated to influence the effect of PDT on keratinocytes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of topical vitamin D in AFL-PDT for AK treatment. Consequently, the investigator compared efficacy, recurrence rate, cosmetic outcome and safety between VitD - AFL-PDT and conventional AFL-PDT.

Enrollment

48 patients

Sex

All

Ages

65 to 85 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Korean patients aged ≥ 18 years who had biopsy-confirmed Actinic keratosis lesions

Exclusion criteria

  • calcium metabolic disorder patients
  • photosensitivity disorder patients
  • lactating or pregnant women
  • patients with porphyria or a known allergy to any of the constituents of the MAL cream and lidocaine
  • patients with systemic disease, history of malignant melanoma, tendency of melasma development or keloid formation, any AK treatment of the area in the previous 4 weeks, or any conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance; and patients on immunosuppressive treatment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Factorial Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

48 participants in 2 patient groups

GroupA (Vit-D pretreated AFL-PDT group )
Experimental group
Description:
Group A was treated with topical VitD-assisted AFL-PDT
Treatment:
Drug: MAL application
Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment
Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application
Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp
Drug: Topical Vitamin D (Calcipotriol) application
GroupB (Conventional AFL PDT group )
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group B was treated with conventional AFL-PDT
Treatment:
Drug: MAL application
Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment
Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity
Drug: Placebo cream application
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application
Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems