ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Efficiency Of High Power Laser Versus Pulsed Electromagnetic Therapy On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Laser Therapy
Pulsed Electromagnetic Therapy

Treatments

Other: Exercise
Device: high power laser therapy
Device: pulsed electromagnetic field therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06825832
laser + electromagnetic field

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study will be conducted to determine the effectiveness of high-power laser and pulsed electromagnetic field on hemiplegic shoulder pain

Full description

One common problem that often manifests two weeks to two months following a stroke is shoulder pain. It adversely impacts patients' quality of life and hinders their ability to regain motor and sensory function. Psychological alterations and sleep problems, such as depression, anxiety, hypervigilance, fear avoidance, pain catastrophizing, trouble falling asleep, and early awakening, can also occure.

The majority of HSP develop in the first 2 weeks up to 6 months and about 65% of those will continue to experience the problem several months after that .

The actual cause of HSP is uncertain and frequently complex. So far, numerous pathogenic processes have been found that are likely to be associated to HSP: Joint subluxation, adhesive capsulitis, complex regional pain syndrome, rotator cuff injury, spasticity, and other conditions .

In the last few decades, an enormous number of treatment options have been developed due to the multiple etiology of HSP, But there is still a great deal of uncertainty regarding their efficacy because several etiologies probably lead to the same problem .

High power laser therapy is one suggested therapeutic option for shoulder pain HPLT has long been used to treat conditions that low power laser therapy (LPLT) cannot, such as increased microcirculation, accelerated tissue regeneration, decreased swelling, inflammation, and pain, because of its photomechanical, thermal, electrical and bio stimulating effects on deep tissues. Benefits of HPLT over LPLT include higher power, deeper tissue penetration, shorter emission durations, and longer rest intervals that avoid heat buildup.

It is hypothesized that compared to single-wavelength low-level laser therapy (LLLT), Multiwave Locked System (MLS) allows for better penetration and therapeutic efficacy .

Magnetic field therapy enhances local cellular activity, organizes collagen fibers, enhances oxygen use in tissues, and speeds up circulation by enhancing blood vessel vasodilation without raising local temperatures but There is insufficient evidence supporting its efficacy and superiority to physical therapy agents .

To our knowledge this is the first study to determine the efficiency of high-power laser and pulsed electromagnetic field on hemiplegic shoulder pain.

Enrollment

42 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. HSP patients aged 40-65 years.
  2. unilateral hemiplegia for the first time.
  3. duration of stroke of more than 6 months.
  4. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of more than 4.
  5. patients with 1-3 degrees of spasticity according to Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with a history of inflammation-related rheumatic disease
  2. cervical radiculopathy
  3. cardiovascular disease or cardiac pacemakers
  4. uncontrolled siezures or sever arrthymia
  5. shoulder operations, or shoulder injection during the previous three months were excluded.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

42 participants in 3 patient groups

INTERVENTION 1 LASER
Active Comparator group
Description:
The MLS® Laser Therapy device used in this study is M6 (ASA srl -Arcugnano, Italy), equipped with both a robotized multidiode head (up to 3,3W), able to perform automatic scanning treatments, and an MLS® handpiece (up to 1,1W), aimed to perform manual point to point or scanning treatments. Each treatment includes two stages: the scanning of the frontal and dorsal shoulder area of 93 cm2 each with a robotized multidiode head and a point-by-point process with the manual handpiece with 7 points of 3,14 cm2 area. 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks
Treatment:
Device: high power laser therapy
INTERVENTION 2 PEMFT
Active Comparator group
Description:
the PEMF application, with application of low intensity and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), the portable device PMT QS (ASA Srl, Arcugnano) is used, equipped with Flexa applicators (36 x 21 x 2 cm (L x P x H) - 1.2 kg), programmable frequency from 0.5 to 100 Hz and variable magnetic field intensity from 5% to 100% (from \~2.5 to \~40 Gauss)), two solenoid applicators are placed at the anterior and posterior positions in the patient's shoulders and applied for 25 min at 25 G intensity at a frequency of 50 Hz.3 sessions per week for 4 weeks
Treatment:
Device: pulsed electromagnetic field therapy
INTERVENTION 3 EXERCISE
Active Comparator group
Description:
The conventional exercise program for hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is stretching exercise therapy, joint stabilization exercise therapy.3 sessions per week for 4 weeks
Treatment:
Other: Exercise

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems