Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Pulse field ablation (PFA) has shown safety and efficacy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), while the application in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is still under investigation. The investigators' previous randomized controlled trial showed favorable outcomes with electrogram (EGM) guided radiofrequency ablation in PerAF. However, EGM-guided PFA has not yet been reported.
Full description
Multiple studies have confirmed that pulse field ablation (PFA) demonstrates superior safety and efficacy in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, the application of PFA in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remains in the exploratory stages. The efficacy and safety of PFA across various ablation strategies require a comprehensive evaluation. Notably, electrogram (EGM) guided PFA ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation has not yet been reported in the literature.
In the investigators' previous study on radiofrequency ablation for PerAF, the investigators observed that EGM guided ablation yielded a high success rate. Furthermore, the investigators' recent research has confirmed that intraoperative termination of atrial fibrillation using EGM guided ablation is associated with favorable long-term outcomes in patients with PerAF.
The investigators aim to explore the preliminary application of EGM guided pulse field ablation (PFA) in persistent atrial fibrillation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients with documented drug-resistant symptomatic persistent AF meeting all three of the following criteria:
Patients who are ≥ 18 years
Patient participation requirements:
Exclusion criteria
AF that is:
Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 60 mm as documented by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or computed tomography (CT)
Any of the following cardiac conditions:
Any of the following within 3 months of enrollment:
History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities.
Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systemic anticoagulation
Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by premedication
Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating or not using birth control
Medical conditions that would prevent participation in the study, interfere with assessment or therapy, significantly raise the risk of study participation, or confound data or its interpretation, including but not limited to
Current or anticipated enrollment in any other clinical study
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
58 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal