Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In this study, Investigators planned to compare ejaculatory sparing and non-ejaculatory sparing (conventional) TUIP using both subjective and objective assessment tools for the degree of deobstruction.
Furthermore, the impact of both techniques on ejaculation and its secondary effect on orgasm perception and different domains of sexual function will be thoroughly assessed.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc; Ahmed Alhussein, MBBCH
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal