ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring and ICU Infection Rates (HANDS)

R

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cross Infection

Treatments

Other: Weekly poster of unit performance
Other: Active reminder from badge
Other: Daily email of personal feedback

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02511925
2013IC004B

Details and patient eligibility

About

If patients acquire a new infection whilst in hospital this can cause significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalisation and even death. Indeed, there is much public concern about infections such as MRSA. Patients who require intensive care are probably at the greatest risk.

Appropriate hand hygiene by healthcare workers can reduce infection rates and is a key goal of many patient safety initiatives. Worldwide, hand hygiene compliance has been estimated at only 38.7% despite the intervention being simple and cheap. Reasons for poor compliance include lack of time, skin irritation, lack of facilities, intensity of workload and forgetfulness. Furthermore, since cross infection may not be apparent for some days, staff may not associate their (lack of) actions with having caused harm.

Measuring compliance levels enables staff to understand whether they could improve. Direct observation of staff is labour intensive and is not continuous or universal. We will monitor hand hygiene compliance with a newly developed electronic system (MedSense, General Sensing Inc.). We will use the data to provide feedback to the staff in several ways. We hypothesise that comprehensive personalised feedback will reduce healthcare associated infections. We will undertake the study in three intensive care units.

Full description

All patients admitted to three intensive care units will be monitored for healthcare associated infections. In parallel the units will be cluster randomised to implement the electronic compliance monitoring in three different ways:

  • Unit level feed back every week of current compliance for each of three staff groupings (doctors, nurses, allied health professionals)
  • Personalised feedback in the form of an email at the end of a shift stating an individuals performance relative to the average for their professional grouping.
  • Real time feedback in the form of a badge worn by the healthcare worker that vibrates when the system thinks they have missed or are about to miss an opportunity for hand hygiene.

All healthcare workers will receive the level of feedback defined in the randomisation for the duration of the three intervention periods. The units will cross-over with an interventing two week wash out period.

All personal feedback will be confidential and private to the individual.

Enrollment

1,065 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients admitted to the intensive care units
  • All healthcare workers caring for the patients on the intensive care units.

Exclusion criteria

  • Healthcare workers with skin sensitivity to both alcohol hand rub and soap

Trial design

1,065 participants in 3 patient groups

ICU Cluster 1
Description:
Adult Intensive Care Unit - Royal Brompton Hospital
Treatment:
Other: Weekly poster of unit performance
Other: Daily email of personal feedback
ICU Cluster 2
Description:
Paediatric ICU - Royal Brompton Hospital
Treatment:
Other: Weekly poster of unit performance
Other: Daily email of personal feedback
Other: Active reminder from badge
ICU Cluster 3
Description:
Adult Intensive Care Unit - Harefield Hospital
Treatment:
Other: Weekly poster of unit performance
Other: Daily email of personal feedback
Other: Active reminder from badge

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems