Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will assess the efficacy of receiving emergency care at home versus in the brick-and-mortar emergency department.
Full description
Care in an emergency department has many benefits. It delivers high-intensity critical care on demand to large populations and serves as an efficient gateway to hospitalization. However, some populations may not be well-served by the traditional emergency department, particularly older adults, adults with serious illness, and those who are homebound. Many harms may come to older adults in the emergency department, including delirium, pressure injuries, infections, anxiety, and others. Emergency department crowding secondary to hospital capacity constraints may also lead to suboptimal care, as patients wait many hours for their inpatient bed even after a disposition decision is made.
As a result, the investigators will evaluate in a randomized controlled trial the efficacy of emergency care delivered at home instead of in the emergency department
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
oHigh Risk Signs, if available: Heart rate > 120 Systolic blood pressure < 90 Shock Index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) > 1 Oxygen < 93% on ambient air Increase in oxygen requirement new or > 2 liters Respiratory rate > 28 Diaphoresis oHigh Risk Symptoms: Active chest pain Severe work of breathing Syncope Hemoptysis Seizure Other concerning symptom per nurse triage
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,500 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
David Levine, MD, MPH, MA
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal