EMG Controlled Device in Acute Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke

VA Office of Research and Development

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Stroke

Treatments

Device: MARK

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other U.S. Federal agency

Identifiers

NCT04599036

B3554-M

Details and patient eligibility

About

Stroke is a medically relevant problem for the aging population. Individuals with stroke experience a high amount of arm functional deficits despite receiving rehabilitation. Functional deficits can be improved by combining rehabilitation with innovative rehabilitative tools that target the brain mechanisms that guide the recovery early after stroke. This study aims to explore the feasibility of implementing an EMG controlled device in the acute rehabilitation for stroke survivors with severe arm deficit. This study will determine if adding such a technology improve the clinical outcomes for subjects with severe arm impairments beyond the levels achieved by standard care in attempt to increase their chances to independently perform activities of daily living.

Full description

During the first weeks after the onset of stroke, the injured brain undergoes several neural mechanisms, a process known as neuroplasticity, that intend to reorganize the neural connectivity and repair the damaged tissue around the injury region. Several studies revealed that rehabilitation during this acute period of injury would enhance the functional outcome of the paretic arm presumably by modulating the heightened neuroplastic mechanism. Specifically, it has been suggested that novel interventions that interact with the neuroplastic mechanisms of recovery are particularly needed for stroke survivors whom initial arm impairments are severe.

The rationale of this study is to explore if an EMG controlled device can be added to the acute rehabilitation for stroke subjects with severe arm deficit. The study will also investigate if the application of such a device would lead to an even better enhancement of clinical outcomes compared to standard care. Because of such neurophysiological changes during the acute phase, the study aims to correlate the neurophysiological changes with the enhancement gained as a result of practicing with an EMG controlled device in this population. Thus, test the premise that adding practice with an EMG controlled device to the acute rehabilitation of subjects with severe arm impairments acts as novel rehabilitative tool that interact with the neuroplastic mechanisms of recovery to enhance clinical outcomes for these subjects.

Enrollment

10 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Veterans over 18 years of age
2 days to 6 months since the onset of ischemic stroke
Adequate range of motion at the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand to wear the device.
Ability to generate volitional, consistent, and detectable EMG signals from the upper arm and forearm sensor sites with wrist in neutral or flexed positions as detected by the Myopro software
MAS score 3 for the biceps, triceps, supinators and pronators of the impaired arm
Able to read and comprehend the English language
Able to follow directions
Medically and psychologically stable.

Healthy Controls:

Over 18 years of age No history of neurological or muscular problems that affect arm function

Exclusion criteria

Hemorrhagic stroke

Previous strokes affecting motor function on the opposite side.
Fugl-Meyer score of 2 on the following 3 items:
1. finger mass extension, 2) grasp #1 test, and 3) shoulder flexion 90 - 180 degrees, elbow at 0 degree, and forearm neutral.
Shoulder subluxation, pain or dislocation
Shoulder passive range of motion < 45 degrees in flexion and abduction
Fixed upper limb contractures on the impaired arm and hand
Unable to safely support the weight of their arm plus 4 lbs (1.82 kg; the weight of the device) without pain even with arm supported.
Skin rash or open wound on impaired arm
Involuntary movements of the impaired arm
Pacemaker or other implanted devices
Metal in the skull
Claustrophobia, or inability to operate the MRI patient call button
Past history of seizures
Family history of medication refractory epilepsy
Chronic sleep deprivation, ongoing untreated sleep disorder
Pregnancy or pregnancy planning during the study period
Currently taking medications or substances that lower the threshold for onset of seizure.
Inability to understand English