ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Emotional and Neutral Sounds for Neurophysiological Prognostic Assessment of Critically Ill Patients With a Disorder of Consciousness (ExpressComa)

A

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Disorder of Consciousness

Treatments

Other: Having benefited from a prognostic evaluation by event related potentials (without sound research methods, only neutral sounds)
Other: Use of "expressive" sounds

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05740735
2022-A00607-36 (Other Identifier)
APHP220568

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of emotional sound as subject own name (SON) pronounced by a familiar voice (FV) compared to SON pronounced by a non-familiar voice (NFV) during event related potential (ERP) produced a more reliable neurophysiological P300 responses, and to assess the prognostic value of this P300 responses induced by the SON with a FV.

Full description

The evaluation of the neurological outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOC) is a major medical, ethical and economic issue. These DOC are essentially related to a direct anoxo-ischaemic (post-cardiac arrest), traumatic or even vascular (caused by a hemorrhagic or ischemic vascular accident) cerebral aggression. The techniques currently available, whether neurophysiological (electroencephalogram (EEG) and evoked potentials (EP)), neuroradiological or biological, only allow an approximate evaluation for a large number of aetiologies and patients (Obadi. EEG and EPs have the advantage of being feasible at the patient's bedside, with a precise spatial-temporal resolution of the cerebral capacities to integrate sensory stimulation. If some neurophysiological tests have an imperfect predictive capacity, event-related potentials, (ERPs) with "oddball paradigm" seem to be a promising method. During their realizations by exposing the subject to listening to a deviant and rare auditory stimulus within other frequent stimuli, a first neurophysiological response is generated 150 to 200ms after the stimulation called "mismatch negativity" (MMN), then a second response to 300ms of stimulation called "P3a" is generated. The latter would reflect the orientation of a subject's attention towards the deviant stimulus and could predict arousal.

Some recent data report that a P3 response obtained by exposing the subject to a stimulus with expressive and emotional value, such as the patient's own first name, could improve the prognostic value of this neurophysiological tool (Fischer et al, Holeckova et al). Indeed, the neural processing of expressive voices involves a greater number of subcortical and cortical regions than neutral sounds (Schirmer and Kotz). Moreover, some data suggest that the use of a "subject own name" (SON) auditory stimulus pronounced by a familiar voice (FV) compared to an unfamiliar voice (NFV) could improve the prognostic value of P3 or even the use binaural sounds with a three-dimensional effect as "looming" or "receding" sounds, these hypotheses having never been evaluated in DOC patients.

The investigators hypothesize that cortical and subcortical activation is more complex and intense in response to emotional than to neutral sounds, and that obtaining a P3a response generated by sounds expressive type SON pronounced by a familiar voice (FV) would have a prognostic value greater than the P3 response induced by the SON with an unfamiliar voice for wakefulness prediction of DOC patients; The investigators will also test the hypothesis that the prognostic value of the MMN response generated by sounds with randomly varied motion in their 3D auditory field (e.g. looming or receding sources) is higher than those generated by neutral sounds.

Enrollment

114 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patients hospitalized in ICU for cardiac arrest, stroke, subarachnoid haemorrhage or head trauma,
  • persistent disorder of consciousness (DoC) 12 hours after sedation weaning or patient who has benefited from a prognostic assessment for persistent DoC and who has had in this assessment an evaluation by late PEA with MMN and P300 responses only to neutral sounds ("beep" and patient's first name pronounced by an unfamiliar voice) there is more than 6 months (since April 2022)

Exclusion criteria

  • Moribund patient
  • Uncontrolled Shock during the neurophysiological evaluation
  • Sedated patient
  • Minor patient
  • brain death
  • Known deafness
  • Pregnant woman
  • Prior inclusion in the study
  • Patient not affiliated to a social security system
  • Implementation of limitations and stop of active therapies
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Patient benefiting from State Medical Aid

Trial design

114 participants in 2 patient groups

Disorder of consciousness patients - Prospective group
Description:
DOC defined either by a coma (Glasgow Coma Scale \<8), a vegetative state (VS) or a minimal state of consciousness (MCS) according to the Coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-r) after a primary brain injury: severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)), subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke or cardiac arrest (CA)
Treatment:
Other: Use of "expressive" sounds
Disorder of consciousness patients - Retrospective group
Treatment:
Other: Having benefited from a prognostic evaluation by event related potentials (without sound research methods, only neutral sounds)

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Sarah Benghanem, MD, MSc, PhD student; Marie BENHAMMANI-GODARD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems