Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Homelessness is a national crisis in the United States, particularly in the veteran population. Due to multiple chronic conditions, homeless individuals frequently become hospitalized or are treated in emergency departments. Care engagement can mitigate this risk. Interventions grounded in evidence-based practices of peer support and whole health are effective for increasing care engagement. However, implementation of such interventions with high-acuity patients often requires strategies that are intensive and costly. This trial will evaluate the relative impacts and costs of using a high-intensity (vs. low-intensity) strategy to implement a peer-led, whole health intervention for homeless-experienced veterans in permanent supportive housing.
Full description
Background: Homelessness is a national crisis in the United States, particularly in the Veteran population. Due to multiple chronic conditions, homeless individuals have elevated risk for acute care service use. Engagement in primary and specialty care can mitigate this risk. Interventions grounded in evidence-based practices of peer support, patient-centered care, and whole health are effective for increasing service engagement. However, implementation of such interventions with high-acuity patients often requires multi-component strategies that are intensive and costly. This study protocol describes a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial of Employing Peer Outreach and Whole Health in Recovery (EMPOWER) with high-need, homeless-experienced Veterans in permanent supportive housing and will evaluate the impact and cost of a high-intensity (vs. low-intensity) strategy on implementation outcomes.
Methods: (Aim 1) At 7 sites in the Veterans Health Administration (VA), a mixed methods pre-implementation evaluation will identify determinants and their potential impact on uptake of the EMPOWER and inform modifications to the intervention and implementation strategies as needed. (Aim 2) A staircase cluster randomized design will evaluate the rollout of the implementation strategies, beginning with Audit and Feedback (low-intensity) and then switching to Facilitation (high-intensity) after 6 months. Facilitation is hypothesized to have a greater impact on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation (fidelity), and maintenance of EMPOWER. (Aim 3) A budget impact analysis will estimate the average cost of implementing EMPOWER at future sites and comparative costs for implementing the low- and high-intensity strategies.
Anticipated Impact: This study will provide information on the relative impacts and relative costs of strategies aimed at implementing a peer-led, patient-centered, whole health intervention for homeless-experienced Veterans in permanent supportive housing. The findings will provide guidance to VA and other healthcare systems that serve the aging population of homeless-experienced Veterans.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Eligible patients will be identified from VA's Homeless Registry "Hot Spot" reports, which use real-time data on acute care service utilization to identify high-need, housing-insecure patients.
These reports identify Veterans on the VA Homeless Registry (i.e., those who had received VA housing services in the past two years) who had >1 hospital admissions and/or >2 ED visits in the past quarter of the fiscal year.
From these reports, the investigators will identify patients at each implementation site who are
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
278 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Daniel M Blonigen, PhD MA; Jennifer S Smith, MPH
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal