ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

MADRE (Mammograms Available Due to Research and Education)

University of Illinois logo

University of Illinois

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Breast Cancer Screening

Treatments

Other: Empower
Other: Educate

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05841355
2022-0531

Details and patient eligibility

About

The design builds on past studies by integrating social network analysis (SNA) and implementation science (IS) into a longitudinal randomized clinical trial (RCT). The investigator will compare the long-term effects of interventions by examining guideline-concordant initial and repeat Breast Cancer (BC) screening.

Full description

To further test the added benefits of the empower approach relative to traditional educate approaches. Past community research has primarily focused on one-time BC screening among intervention participants. The design builds on past studies by integrating social network analysis (SNA) and implementation science (IS) into a longitudinal randomized clinical trial (RCT). The investigator will compare the long-term effects of interventions by examining guideline-concordant initial and repeat BC screening. The investigator will estimate the widespread effects of interventions by prospectively collecting data from network members not involved in the RCT. The investigator will also explore "active ingredients" that underlie intervention effects, including psychosocial, IS and network mechanisms. Overall, the investigator will demonstrate whether and how non-adherent individuals may "boost" intervention effects throughout their networks.

The investigator's goal is to further test the added benefits of the empower approach relative to traditional educate approaches. Past community research has primarily focused on one-time BC screening among intervention participants. The investigator's novel design builds on past studies by integrating social network analysis (SNA) and implementation science (IS) into a longitudinal randomized clinical trial (RCT). The investigator will compare the long-term effects of interventions by examining guideline-concordant initial and repeat BC screening. The investigator will estimate the widespread effects of interventions by prospectively collecting data from network members not involved in the RCT. The investigator will also explore "active ingredients" that underlie intervention effects, including psychosocial, IS and network mechanisms. Overall, the investigator will demonstrate whether and how non-adherent individuals may "boost" intervention effects throughout their networks.

Aim 1: Among 400 non-adherent individuals, the investigator will compare intervention effects on BC screening, using an individual RCT in a federally qualified health center (FQHC). The investigator will use the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines - i.e., 40-74 year-olds should obtain mammograms every 2 years.

Aim 2: Among 200 network members, the investigator will compare intervention effects on BC screening, based on the USPSTF guidelines.

Aim 3: The investigator will explore mechanisms of change underlying intervention effects on BC screening using IS measures, descriptive SNA, and structural equation models. If study arms are comparable, the investigator will examine which mechanisms may predict multilevel intervention effects across approaches.

Enrollment

600 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

40 to 74 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Aim 1

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female biological sex
  • identification as Latinas
  • non-adherence to USPSTF guidelines (42-74 years old, no mammogram in past 2 years, no previous BC diagnosis)
  • no previous history of health volunteerism
  • not a network member enrolled in Aim 2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not meeting at least one of the aforementioned Aim 1 inclusion criteria.

Aim 2.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female biological sex
  • eligibility to obtain BC screenings by USPSTF guidelines (i.e., 40-74 years old, no personal BC history)
  • referral from Aim 1 participants
  • no previous history of health volunteerism
  • no participation in the RCT (not an Aim 1 participant, no Session #3 attendance).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting at least one of the aforementioned Aim 1 inclusion criteria.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Screening

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

600 participants in 2 patient groups

Educate (Education + Navigation) Sessions
Other group
Description:
Session 1 BC knowledge, BC disparities, USPSTF guidelines, barriers and preferred solutions to BC screening, Community Health Workers (CHW) testimonials, empirical data, individual action plans for BC screening Session 2 \&3 Health knowledge (diet and physical activity guidelines), barriers and preferred solutions to dietary and physical activity change, CHW testimonials, empirical data, individual action plans for diet
Treatment:
Other: Educate
Empower (Empowerment + Navigation) Sessions
Other group
Description:
Session 1 BC knowledge, BC disparities, USPSTF guidelines, barriers and preferred solutions to BC screening CHW testimonials, Empirical data, Individual action plans for BC screening Sessions 2 \& 3 BC screening as leading by example, BC promotion strategies that reflect personal and network members' preferences, opportunities to volunteer/be a part of tight-knit initiatives, partnerships with navigators/CHWs to serve as "bridges" for network members CHW testimonials , resource guides for BC promotion, individual action plans for promoting BC, role playing activities (session 2) Participant testimonials, participant relays empirical data, group discussion and plans for promoting BC (session 3)
Treatment:
Other: Empower

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Yamile Molina, PhD; Jocelyn Perez

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems